Are You a Soldier?

May 30th, 2011

“No one engaged in warfare entangles himself with the affairs of this life, that he may please him who enlisted him as a soldier.” – 2 Timothy 2:4

“So, you’re a soldier?”

“Yep, I’m a soldier.”

“Where did you go to boot camp?”

“Oh, I’ve never been to boot camp.”

“Which branch of the service are you with?”

“I don’t believe in branches of service.”

“Are you with a specific company or platoon?”

“Oh, no, I just kinda meet with some guys when I can.  I’m pretty busy with other things.”

“Ever been in a battle or seen combat?”

“Nope.  That’s not my calling.”

“Ever even fired a weapon?”

“Don’t think so.  Maybe once on accident.”

“You don’t seem like a soldier to me.”

“Hey, man, don’t judge me!”

Peace.

Are You a Christian?

May 27th, 2011

I would have a difficult time convincing anyone I was a mechanic.  I know how to drive a car, both automatic and manual, and I know the basic idea behind engines and such, but no one in their right mind would pay me any money or trust me to tell them what was wrong with their car or to attempt to fix it.  Nor should they.  It would be ridiculous, therefore, to assert that I am a mechanic.  A quick series of questions by anyone half knowledgeable about the craft would prove it.

But we get really defensive if we call ourselves a Christian and someone questions it.  The term itself, Christian, has become either so diluted or so maligned that many refuse to even use it anymore, which is a somewhat different debate for a different time.  The term, Christian, is actually from the Bible, where the believers in Antioch were called such by the city around them.  Christian means “little Christ,” and as I harp on all the time, the term was generated by the overwhelming testimony the disciples of Christ had in that city.

Despite the outrage many feel when questioned (or may be feeling now even reading the title of the blog … and continuing to read), it is completely biblical.  We are told that we are not to judge those in the world but those in the church, all in context of a standard of lifestyle that is necessary fruit of a changed life (1 Corinthians 5/6).  We are told to examine – and test – ourselves to see if we are in the faith (2 Cor 13:5) and to work out our salvation with fear and trembling (Phil 2:12).  In context, both of these statements have moral implications, in Philippians they are told to “obey” and the church in Corinth were about to get a visit from Paul and he was gonna deal with those who were “sinning.”

So what is the measure?  The whole of the New Testament deals with this, but I’ll give two passages and you can just start there.  Examine your life by the Sermon on the Mount and 1 John (yes, the whole letter), and see how your life measures up.  There are also doctrinal tests within those passages, as well, especially 1 John.   (For a lot more on this, you can go back to an earlier series I did on Disciples)  Can we go too far in our judgment of our brothers and sisters in Christ?  Absolutely.  But to deny the standard is just as dangerous as abusing it.

Our modern scholars, both conservative and liberal, have become experts and reading the Bible and explaining away doing what it actually says, just from different perspectives.  The conservatives claim inerrancy but twist passages to say things that go against clear and universal biblical teaching.  The liberals do away with inspiration and inerrancy and either claim that the scriptures they don’t like were made up or culturally irrelevant to our day.

The end result is the same, to deny the standard and the testimony handed down to us of what it means to be a disciple of Christ, no matter what you call it.  Anyone who thinks Christianity is just another means to live a good, decent American life (whatever that means to them) either hasn’t actually read the Bible or has read it and doesn’t believe it, regardless of their views on inerrancy.  To be a Christian means that you love, speak, and act like Jesus Himself.  Anything less insults the power and work of God through Christ.

Post is getting long … more on this later …

Peace.

Some thoughts on THE END

May 24th, 2011

Well, May 21st came and went … and certain predictions didn’t come true.  But a good thing may have come out of tall this.  While we can all agree that these people were wrong and continue to be wrong (now it’s Oct 21 … ), it also got people who want to know what God really says to delve into the Bible and discuss these things with one another to get at some important truths.  So there are a few thoughts to share.

First, just because some guy out in California continues to make a fool out of himself in relation to things about the end times doesn’t mean that anyone who believes that Jesus is coming back is a fool.  Jesus is coming back, at a date no one will know and will be a surprise to everyone, and He will establish something that will be so phenomenal … I’m not sure we can fully comprehend it since it is even more awesome than what we have now.  Some end times details may be up for debate, but that is a clear teaching.  Many will mock that anyway, as has been promised also in Scripture, but those who know Christ are expectantly waiting for His return.

Second, we must be wary of anyone who speaks of the end times as escapism.  Nowhere does the Bible talk about the end times and then excuse half-way Christianity.  The Kingdom of God is here and now and working and active and powerful beyond imagining.  We have the Spirit of Christ within His people now.  Creation is groaning and waiting for the sons of God to be revealed … that means the saints of God!

Third, the way to be “ready” for His return is to live holy, righteous lives.  Knowing the earth will one day all be destroyed and recreated into a new heavens and new earth, Peter says, what kind of people ought we to be … “in holy conduct and godliness” and “diligent to be found by Him in peace, without spot and blameless” (2 Peter 3).  Maxing out your credit cards for vacations or going into debt for billboards aren’t necessarily proof that you understand how to get ready.

Fourth, if anyone seriously gives you a day and time “from God,” you can safely assume they are wrong … and if it is the pastor of your church, don’t walk, run.

Last, and this is a little more personal, for every dude out in Cali or Westboro Baptist Church there are dozens, or more, of churches out there changing lives with the love and power of Jesus Christ.  They may be from all different backgrounds and paradigms, but they are out there.  The media won’t tell those stories, and those churches don’t advertise what they’re doing (real churches don’t have to), but they are out there.  It is essential in this hour and in this nation that you are a part of one.

Peace.

St. Patrick

March 17th, 2011

Every year I try to say something about St. Patrick.  Not thinking about much new this year that I haven’t already said.

But I have been meditating this year, especially while meditating on one of my heroes, about how screwed up American holidays are.

We do a horrible job honoring what the holiday is supposed to be about.  St. Paddy’s day is a great example.  We have successfully sold a lot of green T-shirts and other gaudy crap but haven’t gone much farther than that.  We’ll sell and drink a lot of green beer and wear green beads and pinch people who dare flaunt that tradition.

St. Patrick was a man who risked his life and gave up his personal and religious “career” to go back to a barbaric, pagan land that had enslaved him and he told them about Jesus.  He saw converts killed for their beliefs and fought against the Catholic hierarchy to keep the Irish Christianity independent from their religious control.

We live in a country more likely to make a cheesy Leprachaun movie with great songs by Elton John than a big budget high quality film about the life of Patrick.  The latter would make a great movie, by the way.  So would a movie about St. Nicholas.  And probably St. Valentine, too.  But we’d rather bury our heads in the consumeristic sand.

If we want to honor St. Patrick, I will say the same thing I say almost every year.  Tell people about Jesus.  Tell them Jesus loves them and wants to change their whole life.  Give to the poor.  Show compassion to the broken.  Then after that you can join me down at the pub for a Guinness.

Peace.

Roland Allen Cracks the Top Ten

March 14th, 2011

As some of you know, I’m getting a Master’s degree online in church planting.  Both getting a Master’s and the subject matter have been on my mind for a while, so I just stuck them together to see what happens.

So far so good.  Some interesting material, but of course you have to wade through a lot of it to find the nuggets.  There is a lot of reading, and I found a gem.

There is a short list of books that I would recommend to Christians to read.  Most of the books out there might be good, but not necessarily in this category.  In fact, I wouldn’t even put my own book in this category yet.  Maybe I’ll write one of those one day.

For example, I would recommend any Christian read Mere Christianity (CS Lewis), Knowledge of the Holy (Tozer), Cost of Discipleship (Bonhoeffer), and then we get into Watchman Nee’s Glorious Church, Andrew Murray’s Humility, Kempis’ Imitation of Christ, etc.

It is rare that I read something and put it in those categories.  And I read.  A lot.  Roland Allen’s Missionary Methods: St. Paul’s or Ours? is one of those books.

It is full of insight and applicable to any Christian on the subject of evangelism or church planting, or basic ecclesiology for that matter.  Ironically, this book wasn’t required reading for one of my courses, but God nudged me to buy it and I’ve underlined half of it.  It is mercilessly short, but like some of the books mentioned above, so deep and full of meaning that rambling would have ruined it.

Roland Allen, an Anglican, knows the scriptures and history.  His scholarship is sound without being about his scholarship.  He makes his point.  Well.  The book is beautifully simple and full of life.

Most Christian ministers will have a problem giving this book its due.  It tells them that if they want to do their job well, they have to work themselves out of a job.  Other church planting books call this one “revolutionary” but then dismiss it as unrealistic.  I couldn’t agree with Allen more.  Also, in light of the current shift away from any notion of a “mean” God, Allen’s description of Paul’s gospel would offend a modern conscience.  So there’s a little in here for everyone that will make you uncomfortable.  That just means it is full of truth.

I don’t say this often, and I make fun of people who do, but anyone serious about church planting, evangelism, or the nature of the church should read this book.  It affirms biblical principles in those areas, gives a sound and needed look at Paul’s ministry, and is flexible enough to be applicable to anyone seeking to really do church in a biblical way.

And guess what.  It’s free on the internet.  I bought it before I realized this, and I’m glad I did, but here’s the link to read it if you can handle reading stuff on a computer screen.  Roland Allen, Missionary Methods: St. Paul’s or Ours?

Peace.

Examining Relationships

March 5th, 2011

There are generally three types of Christians, when it comes to relationships with the church and the world.

Before I continue, allow me to define here what I mean by church.  I mean here the local church, a single congregation of believers committed in covenant with one another.  That is your church.  Yes, there is also the Church universal, which I greatly believe in, but for the sake of this post, I mean the local church you to which you have (or possibly have not) committed yourself.   So, in no particular order …

Type A: these Christians go to church but really don’t know anyone at their church.  If they do, it is only in a very peripheral sense, handshakes at the door, in and out.  They do, however, have a very extensive group of friends outside the church.  These are the people they feel very close to and probably have very little spiritual conversation with.  They generally consider their religion a private thing and not to be shared in any real sense.

Type B: these Christians go to church and their closest friends are there in the church.  They have little to no contact with those outside the Christian subculture since they can find nothing in common with them, and their inclination is to be judgmental to those outside of their belief system, even other Christians.

Type C: these Christians might go to church but have little to no contact with anyone in the church.  They also have little to no contact with the outside world.  They’ve isolated themselves from both the community of faith and the world around them for a myriad of reasons, but it has generally progressed from losing friends through other life transitions and not being intentional about replacing that void with healthy ones.  So they have none.

Type D: a relatively new type of Christian over the last few decades (although possibly this type has existed before throughout history … I’m going more on my own experience here), this Christian has some friends in the world and some Christian friends but does not truly commit to any one fellowship, all in the name of a lofty idea of the Church universal.  These Christians generally treat churches and ministries like consumers – they like the praise at this service, the preaching at this other ministry, and the fellowship over at that small group.  They have a hard time committing to one group out of either a fear of being controlled, limited, or missing out on something someone else is doing that they might like.

If this isn’t clear to you by now, I believe all of the above types to be unhealthy.  There may be a time of transition where a person may live in one of these types (I have been all of these through short seasons in my life), but over the course of the life of a Christian, none of these should be normal.  I realize that this may cause offense, since most people within these categories are convinced that it’s working for them and deny any challenge to their personal choice.  Well, it hasn’t stopped me before …

What is normative, biblical and healthy for a disciple of Christ is the following:

Type E: these Christians have their closest relationships within the local church.  They are a family with those in the community of faith.  The relationships within the church are where the Christian finds his or her refuge and safety.  They are not separate from the world, however.  They regularly have contact with their physical community, be it neighborhood, school, job, etc.  They are friends with those outside the church and have a good reputation among their community for being kind, generous, full of integrity and a contributing member of the society around them.

This is spiritual maturity, which by nature more than implies the others are spiritually immature (again, understanding some may take offense).  It takes great spiritual maturity and discipline to maintain a pure Christian witness, being intimate with other believers, and fostering a good and respectful relationship with all of humanity.  This balance is only maintained through being properly intentional in each area – and constantly seeking God and being humbled by Him.  Otherwise, extremes persist and one of the other types become the new norm.

There is great wisdom in being “in the world” and yet not “of the world.”  It is a powerful thing.

Peace.

We’ve Been Here Before …

March 5th, 2011

Time to formulate some thoughts here in a more cohesive statement to address some modern (postmodern? … whatever) thinking.

There is this idea, both implied and specifically stated, by many that the Bible has lost its validity over the last two thousand years because of either a) the limitations of the time they lived in, b) the progressive state that our society has achieved or c) both.

As a historian, these are short sighted and ignorant of the facts.  To assume that Paul (or Peter or Jesus, for that matter) was such a product of his culture that his thoughts on certain things are to be summarily dismissed is based on a certain type of ethnocentric pride: our own.

What things?  Well, we can dance around it, but our postmodern society (and more liberal Christians) take issue with Paul’s strong stand and language against things like homosexuality, premarital sex, and other issues some pride themselves in either finding tolerance for or even celebrating.

But when we look at the Hellenistic culture of which Paul was intimately familiar, being highly educated in Greek philosophy and a Roman citizen, and the Gentiles that were also products of that culture, we see a culture that was not only tolerant of homosexuality and other sexual practices, but openly celebrated many of them in their religious ceremonies through male and female prostitutes.  The Hellenistic culture was also pluralistic with its many gods and acceptance of all religions, as long as you ultimately bowed your head to the state, too.  The fact is that the Roman world, even with its impressive Pax Romana, in the days of Jesus and Paul were farther down this road than we are today.

Why were Christians and Jews so persecuted under the Roman systems if they were products of commonly held beliefs?  Their ideas were so radical as to engender fear against a perceived political rebellion.  This was due to more than just the Christian stand on sexual purity, surely.  But it wasn’t mutually exclusive from it, either.

Were these men products of their culture?  In many ways they were.  This isn’t to deny their cultural involvement, whether Jewish or Hellenistic, only to point out that many of the things our modern liberal thinkers have the most problem with were counter-cultural then, as well … far more than we today realize.

The Church in the West is undergoing a much needed transition.  Traditions of men that we’ve held on to for so long will be put away or further corrupted by modern institutions.  A simpler, more genuine, more radical faith and church is emerging.

But in times of transition, people want to throw everything out.  It is natural.  You begin to question and you end up questioning everything.  And if not done reasonably, we throw out things we shouldn’t in favor of the worldly philosophy of our own society, becoming in fact the very things we accuse men two thousand years ago of doing.

What those who truly want to be disciples of Christ will find, however, is that as the church is reformed once again (judgment must begin at the house of God), the reforms that bear the most fruit and address our growing pluralistic, hedonistic culture the best will be the principles and clear teachings of the Bible.  The Bible, in many ways, is more valid and applicable today in our Western world than it has been in centuries, possibly a thousand years or more.  This excites me and encourages me.  The Church today has an opportunity not seen in hundreds of years, to prove that believing and living the truths expressed in the New Testament will turn the world upside down again.  I pray that we take it seriously.

Peace.

The Front Porch and the Deck

March 2nd, 2011

Culture changes.  This is normal.  People move and grow or things decline.  Not all things progress.  Some problems arise, persist, or grow epidemic.

One change I have been meditating on recently is the change from the front porch to the back deck.  As our American culture has grown, more people build and use a deck in the back of the house as a place to congregate than a front porch visible by the street.

I blame this in part on the suburbanization of our culture.  This is shifting again, which has its pros and cons, back to more urbanization, but for decades people moved from the city out to the suburbs.  In doing so, part of the shift has been a thinking that separated us from our neighbors.  We can see this visibly in the difference between a front porch and a deck.

The front porch is visible by the street and other houses on the street.  The house we recently lived while in Lawrenceville had a front porch.  These were older houses so they still had them.  I loved the front deck.  You could sit on the deck and talk and simultaneously observe the neighborhood and they could observe you.  It communicates more a more welcome attitude and people use the front door to enter the house way more often.

The back deck is different.  The activities on a back deck are hidden from public view.  Some people even build high fences or plant trees to further obstruct visibility.  The front door in many of these homes is not the main entry point of the house.  Day to day, people go in through the garage or another entrance.  The front door becomes more decorative than functional.

When we moved into that neighborhood in Lawrenceville, we went around to meet our neighbors.  We probably knocked on the doors of fifty or sixty houses.  We spoke to, total, maybe eight or ten.  Many times people would be home and would not answer the door.  A couple people that I spoke with would only open the door enough to speak in cautious tones … then one person said, essentially slamming the door in my face, “Let us know if you need anything.”  Hard to believe him.

At the same time, we have a growing number of people that truly feel connected … over email and Facebook.  On the one had I thank God for the connectivity we can have over the internet.  This makes some level of communication with close brothers and sisters of mine in Selmer, Teneesese; Sante Fe, New Mexico; Ohio, or Key West that I wouldn’t normally have.  But if you live five minutes away from me and think that an occasional email with me is a satisfying or intimate relationship, something is broken in our thinking.

What is the point of all my rambling?  I can’t do that much to change culture, and the church has to be careful in its criticism therein, but it is difficult to learn how to love your neighbor when you continue to erect barriers to even come into contact with them.  The culture can do what it wants, but the church is called to something higher.

The Kingdom of God is an invasive thing.  We are invaders on enemy territory, to a degree, so believers need to rethink and re-engage ways to do something very basic in the teachings of Christ, love our neighbor.  We have to find ways to remove those barriers in our own lives, as examples first, and then compassionately use the “all power in heaven and earth given to Me” authority to navigate and even break through those barriers that our neighbors have erected before us.  They may not be New Creations, but they are still His creation and we should learn to love them as our neighbor.

Have a “front porch” mentality, even if you don’t physically have one.  Invite people into your lives.  Don’t hide from the world.  Be vulnerable.  For believers, this begins with other believers and should entail the most intimate relationships we have, but we must also do the same with our neighbors, the humanity all around us worthy of acceptance and basic kindness.

More on this to say later, but that is a start.

Peace.

Do … then Teach

February 28th, 2011

In our Western culture, we’ve done a great job studying certain topics without any practical application or hands on experience.  Generally speaking, we then move those who have been educated in a classroom to then go on and educate others in a classroom.  Then we send people out to actually do something and then wonder why they fail.

The bibilical model of discipleship is very different.  No one learned what it meant to be a Christian in a classroom.  They were given real world, powerful and evident examples of what it meant to be a Christian … first in the person of Jesus Himself, of  course, then on to the apostles and so on.  Then Christianity was explained to them, and it made perfect sense because there was a real live model staring them in the face.  This is the biblical model.

Somewhere along the way the Western church adopted the Western culture and missed biblical truth.  Not surprising that we have the problems in the church that we do.  We’re the best at exegesis but some of the worst at believing and doing what the Bible actually says.  However, it is the latter that truly changes lives and teaches anything.

We were reading through the Sermon on the Mount as men last week, and one statement really stuck with me.  Jesus warns those that teach people to sin, to not follow the commandments or to ignore them, that they will be least in the kingdom … but those that DO the commandments and TEACH others to observe them will be great in the Kingdom.

This is of course connected with the Great Commission as written down by Matthew in chapter 28, to make disciples by “teaching them to observe ALL that I have commanded you.”

Of course our modern theology has made us so gun shy of anything that even suggests “works” that our great biblical scholars just find a way to explain all this away.  Here’s a warning: any doctrine that causes you to explain away things clearly stated and taught in scripture is probably dangerous.

Ultimately, we should be “doers” and not “hearers” only.  I think that is written somewhere, too …  And it is the doers that become the greatest teachers because there is integrity in the whole message of testimony and spoken truth.

Peace.

A New Definition of Profanity

February 7th, 2011

I just finished reading Cross-Cultural Servanthood by Dr. Duane Elmer for a class I’m taking.  Although limited in its scope, it is an instructive book with some compelling thoughts which really hit home in light of my experiences in Korea and traveling and ministering overseas.

One of the thoughts he shares communicates something I’ve been meditating on (and sharing to a certain degree) in a powerful way, and I’ll share some of my thoughts on it.

Elmer gives us a new definition of profanity.  In dealing with others, how we treat them indicates what we believe about their worth.  If we believe that this is a person created by God, in His image, then we treat that person with a certain degree of sacred dignity.  If we do not, then we profane that person.  Dr. Elmer: “We profane another person whenever we fail to honor them as human beings.”

Of course Jesus had something to say about this.  He tells us:  “If you say ‘Raca’, you’ll be in danger of the council.  But if you say ‘you fool!’, you’re in danger of hellfire.”

Think about that.  Hellfire.

Why would Jesus find this idea that important?  Often Christians understand that there are certain words you just don’t say, aren’t allowed to say.  I think Canada recently banned the classic 80′s song “Money for Nothing” because the singer, in the voice of a character, uses the word “faggot.”  We all have our lists of words that our culture determines is wrong to say in and of themselves.  And Christians definitely shouldn’t be known for crude language.

But just not saying certain words doesn’t change the heart.  That’s what we call legalism.  And we find great loopholes in legalism.  Jesus was pointing out that to search for the loophole, the exception to the rule, reveals something worthy not of getting in worldly trouble, but eternal trouble.

Because in searching for the loophole, we are essentially telling God that we fear worldly powers more than spiritual and eternal ones.  We follow moral laws not because we will be brought before an earthly judge but because we understand there is a heavenly one.  To fear the former and ignore the latter is evidence of a lack of faith and true revelation.

So to call someone “a fool” but not use culturally understood crude language is worse than just cussing up a storm.  Whether or not you use crude language doesn’t matter.  Your words and attitudes can still communicate a lack of dignity and understanding that the person you are speaking of – or to – has intrinsic sacred spiritual worth.  God wouldn’t have sent His Son to die otherwise.

Where do these words come from?  Out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks.  We must renew our minds and hearts to think this way about others.  We have been trained to label and categorize people and separate ourselves from one another.  It generally comes from emotional reaction than any effort to bring true discussion and sharing.  That sort of divisive language is meant to create winners and losers, to conquer and not to serve.

Only true disciples can have a heart change this deep with the power of the Holy Spirit.  This, again, shows us our need for God and His Son to teach us and train us in the Way.  Once the heart and mind change, the words and lifestyle will reflect truth.

“Thus the greater profanity may not be cursing, as bad as that is, but failing to extend openness and hospitality to another person who bears the Creator’s image.” – Dr. Elmer.

Peace.