I shared some of these quotes on FB a little while ago, and I wanted to blog about it but I was in the middle of the previous series that I thought should take precedence. So I’m writing about it now …
I majored in Social Studies in college, and taught that subject for several years. Perhaps I’ll get to do it again one day.
So this is a subject that greatly interests me.
In reading some quotes from Thomas Jefferson, someone I love to read about, his thoughts on Christianity were very interesting to me, even inspiring.
As I studied up on Jefferson, I actually found a website dedicated to proving that Jefferson was this Deist who wanted a strict separation of church and state. This was of course a liberal website trying to support their own modern secular idea of the separation of church and state.
They are wrong, but at the same time, I think these quotes are interesting because Jefferson was not the modern evangelical, either. So modern Christian conservatives will have a hard time completely claiming his ideas either. They might be better if they did.
“I had not supposed there was a family in this state [Virginia] not possessing a Bible, and wishing without having the means to procure one. When, in earlier life, I was intimate with every class, I think I was never in a house where that was the case. However, circumstances may have changed, and the [Bible] Society, I presume, have evidence of the fact. I therefore enclose you cheerfully an order … for fifty dollars, for the purposes of the Society.” (1814)
“There was never a more pure and sublime system of morality delivered to man than is to be found in the four Evangelists.” (1814)
“My views of [the Christian religion] … are the result of a life of inquiry and reflection, and very different from that anti-Christian system imputed to me by those who know nothing of my opinions. To the corruptions of Christianity I am, indeed, opposed; but not to the genuine precepts of Jesus Himself. I am a Christian in the only sense in which He wished anyone to be – sincerely attached to His doctrines, in preference to all others …
I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus – very different from the Platonists, who call me infidel and themselves Christians and preachers of the gospel, while they draw all their characteristic dogmas from what its Author never said nor saw. They have compounded from the heathen mysteries a system beyond the comprehension of man, of which the great Reformer of the vicious ethics and deism of the Jews, were He to return on earth, would not recognize one feature.” (1816)
“The Christian priesthood, finding the doctrines of Christ levelled to every understanding and too plain to need explanation, saw in the mysticism of Plato materials with which they might build up an artificial system which might, from its indistinctness, admit everlasting controversy, give employment for their order, and introduce it to profit, power, and preeminence. The doctrines which flowed from the lips of Jesus Himself are within the comprehension of a child; but thousands of volumes have not yet explained the Platonisms engrafted upon them; and for this obvious reason, that nonsense can never be explained.” To John Adams 1814
“… when, in short, we shall have unlearned everything which has been taught since His day, and got back to the pure and simple doctrines He inculcated, we shall then be truly and worthily His disciples; and my opinion is that if nothing had ever been added to what flowed purely from His lips, the whole world would at this day have been Christian …” 1821
“The doctrines of Jesus are simple and tend all to the happiness of man:
1. That there is one only God, and He all perfect.
2. That there is a future state of rewards and punishments.
3. That to love God with all thy heart, and thy neighbor as thyself, is the sum of religion …
But compare with these the demoralizing dogmas of Calvin … The impious dogmatists, as Athanasius and Calvin, … are the false shepherds foretold as to enter not by the door into the sheepfold, but to climb up some other way. They are mere usurpers of the Christian name, teaching a counter-religion made up of the deliria of crazy imaginations, as foreign from Christianity as is that of Mahomet.” 1822
So we see within Jefferson’s thought some interesting ideas. First, he defined being a disciple of Christ, a Christian, as being a person that was dedicated to the teachings of Jesus (and by extension the first Apostles, from a much longer quote I chose not to include, since this was their goal), teachings which Jefferson himself found greater than all others. Wasn’t this the “Great Comission”? “Go and make disciples, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.”
Second, he was obviously against the bringing in of worldly philosophy to something that is fairly simple and easy to understand. He saw the constant lofty thinking as a distraction from simply following the teachings of Jesus and a justification for a professional priest/laity division that was by nature corrupt and self-serving.
Which leads to third, that he saw the great religious and traditional structure of the Christianity of his day as a detriment to true religion, following Jesus.
Did Jefferson go to church? Yep. This is why I love Jefferson. He was an ardent idealist but worked within the necessary reality of his day.
Peace.