Archive for May, 2010

Quick Links

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

I usually don’t share other blogs on here … usually do it on FB, but felt this was the way to encourage some to check it out.

I have found Piper’s stuff and the stuff on the Desiring God blog really encouraging.  Good insights and challenging messages.  If you’re like me and into that, then check Piper out.  This one I thought particularly good from the Desiring God blog:

The Wine Jesus Drank

Also, Eric H in our fellowship has put up a couple great posts on his blog, too.

God Doesn’t Care About Your Church

and  The Word and the Spirit

Peace.

Among the Lilies part 3

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

lily roseBefore I conclude here, the Shulamite also makes a statement related to her identity that I feel is important to note.  She says, “I am my beloved’s, and he is mine.”

Do we really believe that about ourselves?  Do we really believe that the Church belongs to God?  More importantly, do we believe that Christ belongs to the Church?  What does that even mean?

God is looking for a Bride, not a harem of individuals.  The Church is His Bride, singular.  We are so used to thinking of ourselves as individual Christians, we neglect to see God’s purpose in the singular identity of the Body of Christ.  One of those purposes is that not only do we belong to Him alone, but that He belongs solely to the Church.

To be betrothed to Christ means that we have a unique relationship with Him that those outside the Church do not have … and cannot have.  Jesus spoke about these things:  “I go to prepare a place for you”, “ask whatever you will in my name, and it will be done”, etc.  And Paul tells us that the “pillar of truth is in the church.”

Do we really believe that the Church is a special unique place (not the building but the gathering of saints)?  That He is intimate with His people in a way that is separate from all other creation, through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit and the sharing of His divine nature?  It is an essential part of our personal and collective identity that we believe this and live it out in action.  He is manifestly revealed “when two or more are gathered in my name.”

This is why calling people to Christ is calling them to His Body.  There is no separation there.  As it says in Hebrews, contrasting the call of the Old Covenant with the New, the writer says we have not come to a mountain which can be touched or a speaker from the earth but, “to Mount Zion and to the city of the Living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, to an innumerable company of angels” – and are you ready for this? – “to the general assembly (the festal gathering) and church of the firstborn who are registered in heaven, to God the Judge of all, to the spirits of just men made perfect (complete), to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.”

To come to Jesus means to come to all that is one with Him.  To separate out Christ from His Bride, from “the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are registered in heaven”, is to misunderstand and to deny that with which God has chosen to reveal Himself.

So here we come to the answer of the question from the Daughters of Jerusalem: “Where has your beloved gone that we may seek him with you?”

The Shulamite answers, “My beloved has gone to his garden, to the beds of spices, to feed his flock in the gardens, and to gather lilies.  I am my beloved’s, and my beloved is mine.  He feeds his flocks among the lilies.”  She answers her own question from before: “Tell me .. where you feed your flock, where you make it rest at noon.”

Remember the Shulamite, the bride, is the lily of the valley, the lily among thorns.  God is in the business of gathering lilies, gathering those who are fully committed and wed to Him, and feeding His flock there.

He feeds His flock “among the lilies.”

Peace.

Among the Lilies part 2

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

As the love fest continues between the Beloved and the Shulamite, the Shulamite says of herself, “I am the rose of Sharon and the lily of the valleys.”  Then the Beloved says of her, “Like a lily among thorns, so is my love among the daughters.”

It is the Shulamite that is identified as the lily of the valleys, a lily among thorns.  This beautiful picture will be important later.

After the wedding, the Beloved comes to knock at his bride’s door, saying, “Open for me, my sister, my love, my dove, my perfect one; for my head is covered with dew, my locks with the drops of the night.”

But the Shulamite doesn’t open the door right away for him.  “I have taken off my robe; how can I put it on again?  I have washed my feet; how can I defile them?”  In other words: I’m all ready for bed and it’s really inconvenient to be intimate with my husband right now.  By the time she does respond, he is gone.

Others have taught on this, of course, but as Christ and the Church, often it is our immediate response that is required as He seeks to be intimate with us.  We are told in the scripture not to “grieve the Holy Spirit,” which means we shouldn’t offend Him … which means we absolutely can.

The Shulamite goes out to look for her husband but is accosted by the Watchmen.  She suffers the consequences for her slow response and cries out to the Daughters of Jerusalem for help to find him.

Here the Daughters give an interesting response:  “What is your beloved more than another beloved, o fairest among women?  What is your beloved more than another beloved that you so charge us?”  Essentially, what makes him so special?  There is a correlation between the fact that the Shulamite didn’t immediately respond when called upon by her lover and the perception of the Daughters of Jerusalem that he ain’t so hot.

Often it is the same with the Church.  How are others supposed to believe in the supremacy of Christ when His Church is slow to respond and obey when He calls?  Our testimony does have consequences.

The Shulamite answers the Daughters’ questions with a litany of desperate and poetic descriptions of her Beloved.  She repents by exclaiming publicly how special her beloved is.  And the Daughters respond: “Where has your beloved gone, o fairest among women?  Where has your beloved turned aside, that we may seek him with you?”

As the Church returns to Her first love, she cannot help but draw others to seek Him as well.

The answer to the Daughters’ question coming next …

Peace.

Among the Lilies Part 1

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

The Song of Solomon is so beautiful as poetry and in its ability to be applied in so many ways and areas.  Most of scripture has many different levels of interpretation, and the Song of Solomon is great to use as principles for courting and marriage as well as the relationship between Christ and the Church.

As I was reading the Song of Solomon recently, God shared some things with me that I thought interesting, so I’ll share with you.  Now, I’ll be using the New King James translation and its designation of who is speaking, which can differ from NIV or others.  I could go into why that is, but I think the New King James is sufficient for this particular teaching.

There are several characters here in the Song of Solomon.  We have the Beloved (the male), the Shulamite (the female), the Daughters of Jerusalem, the brothers of the Shulamite, and the friends of the Bridegroom/Beloved, not to mention characters that do not speak like the Watchmen.  The main conversation is between the Beloved and the Shulamite, but the others are also important.

In the beginning of the poem, the Shulamite asks a question: “Tell me, o you whom I love, where you feed your flock, where you make it rest at noon.  For why should I be as one who veils herself by the flocks of your companions?”

She is asking her lover where he feeds his flocks, where he makes them rest.  She makes a difference between HIS flocks and the flocks of his companions, where she must veil herself.  The implication is that with his flock, she will be free and not need to veil herself.

This is a good question, and a good desire to have.  Should we not, as disciples, seek to know where God’s people are, where he feeds them and where he makes them rest?  We absolutely should.  It is a godly desire to seek after His people and His rest.

But the Beloved doesn’t directly answer the question.  “If you do not know, o fairest among women, follow in the footsteps of the flock, and feed your little goats beside the shepherds’ tents.”

In other words: follow My flock, and you’ll find the answers to your question.

God often does this.  He is often asked a question and does not directly answer it.  God does this for several different reasons.  Sometimes it’s because we’re not really ready for the answer.  We still need some seeking and character to be ready for that answer.  Sometimes it is because there is something more at the root that needs to be dealt with first.  Sometimes it is just the wrong question.  Other times it is a question that doesn’t really seek truth but seeks to criticize God.  Either way, He is able to discern what the true need is and addresses it.

The Shulamite has a heart of love, but she needs to be taken to a place of revelation and identity before He can truly answer that question for her.

And often the answer to many questions that people have about God comes down to their willingness to walk in the footsteps of His people and submit to the shepherds He has placed over them.  “Imitate me as I imitate Christ,” as Paul said, and this is much of discipleship, not just hearing good doctrine but seeing it walked out on a day to day basis.

Part 2 coming soon …

Peace.

Social Justice according to the Bible

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

I know, I know.  Here I go actually reading that book we all say we believe and just taking what it says as true.  Silly in such a progressive age, sure, but I’m crazy that way.

I have a notebook of quotes from the Bible that I wrote down, freehand, as I read through the Bible a couple years ago.  They were all scriptures about the poor and justice, and some interesting things came out of it.  (I was going to write a book called God’s Heart for the Poor, which I still may write … but we’ll see …)

I’ll give a short summary here since this is a blog and not a systematic commentary and I don’t want to just copy and paste a billion scriptures.  Okay, that’s an exaggeration, but there is a lot.  The Bible talks about this issue A LOT.

To begin with, while poverty may be part of the curse of the Fall, the Bible never truly promises an earthly rid of poverty.  That isn’t the nature of why we have compassion on those in need.  A little more on that later.

Even Job, supposedly the first written book, a contemporary of Abraham, before any written scriptures or the Mosaic Law, talks at length about how part of righteousness is how you treat the poor and the widow and the orphan.  You can see this as Job defends himself for being a righteous man in front of his non-helpful friends.  This principle of personal compassion is consistent through the New Testament.

When you get to the Law, it is amazing the number of provisions made for the poor, everything from the Year of  Jubilee to rules on how you harvested crops or lent money.  The Law gets this bad rap f or being so strict and unmanageable, but Jesus calls the heart of the law “mercy and justice.”  And you can see that if you don’t fall asleep reading it.

But there was an important aspect to the Law that we have to see.  In the day to day operations, ie harvesting, lending, etc., the Law treated every man as a free man with a choice.  In other words, there was little enforcement by any authority on most of these principles, and almost no legal punishment if they did not follow.  It put the responsibility to follow these principles on the individual.  Of course a judgment from God was forthcoming if they wouldn’t follow them, but it wasn’t managed by an overarching beauracracy that forced compliance.  Even the Old Testament Law was designed to make the individual feel personally responsible and compassionate for his neighbor, hence the 2nd greatest commandment Jesus listed after loving God: to love your neighbor.

Other important principles in the Old Testament include the fact that poverty isn’t always the result of oppression.  Laziness and foolishness bring it on, as well.  In other words, sometimes poverty is the result of individual choice.  But interesting enough, whether or not it was by personal choice did not come into consideration when being compassionate and giving to those in need.

Justice reached not only to the poor, but to the rich, as well.  Biblically speaking, it was wrong to withhold justice from both the poor and the rich and not to judge according to either label.  Some considerations in religion were made for the poor if they could not pay or provide certain things under the Old Law, but any idea of requiring more from the rich because they are rich (like a progressive income tax) is biblically unjust.

Also interesting, especially when you get to the Prophets towards the time of the exile of Judah to Babylon and onward, part of the judgment of God was to raise up the poor and lay low the rich, to essentially make the poor rich and the rich poor.

There are also some amazing promises for giving to the poor, most amazingly that “you will never lack.”

All of these ideas were, in one form or another, carried over into the New Testament.  Ideas of individual obedience, personal compassion, and rights of property prevailed, even as teachings of extreme giving were common.

For instance, Jesus tells the rich young ruler to sell all he has and give it to the poor, a teaching Jesus actually made publicly to the masses, as well, as an indication of discipleship.  When asked, “Who is my neighbor?” as Jesus tells us to love our neighbor, Jesus tells a story about a Samaritan who took personal responsibility to meet another’s great and dire need, at great cost to the Samaritan, differentiated from the Jews who passed by and didn’t want to be inconvenienced.

Oh, and the very clear idea of what is a need?  “Food and clothing, with these be content”, the same standard mentioned by both Jesus and Paul.  No mention of housing, education, occupation, or health care is ever mentioned.

Ananias and Sapphira were killed by God for “lying to the Holy Spirit”, however, and not for their lack of giving.  Peter makes it clear that their property was their own to do whatever they wished.  Paul makes it clear that while he seeks that the Corinthians give according to their promise, he does not require it of them and wishes them to give under NO obligation.

One more major thing of note in the New Testament: the poor are never rebuked for being poor.  There are no warnings or dire judgments on them for being poor … but there are for the rich.  Read the “beatitudes” in Luke and the letter from James to see what I mean.

Also absent from any discussion in the scriptures (Old Testament or New) is any indication that we should expect those in need to respond in any specific way.  Their response is individual, like the responsibility of those able to give, and between them and their Creator, who will hold all accountable.

In fact, going by the Bible, Christianity is the only religion that does not promise a Utopian/perfect society on Earth if its morals were followed.  Continually promised are eternal and spiritual blessings for the individual far more than any worldly ones.  It could be argued that Judaism may have promised such a society, and that is probably the only difference between the teachings of the New Testament with the Old on the issue of poverty and “social justice.”  In truth, the New Testament promises persecution and trouble for the righteous way more than some peaceful or prosperous life.  That’s a big departure from the Old Testament.

So in conclusion, the common themes we have are individual responsibility to feel personally compassionate to those you see in need, regardless of how they came by that position, with little or no (New Testament: none) obligation or compulsion given by an authority over the individual to comply.  This is what the Bible clearly teaches.  You have to twist and misrepresent both Jesus and the Bible to teach anything else as Christian.

Peace.

Fathers in the Faith and UP

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

uppicIf I’ve used this movie before as an example, I apologize … kinda.  Only to a degree because I love the movie UP.  It is quickly becoming one of my favorite Pixar movies, which is saying a lot because I think Pixar consistently  makes the best and most creative movies on the market.

So I watched this movie again this weekend.  In the midst of getting choked up yet AGAIN, God showed me and taught me something in the midst of it.

Let me take a moment to again say that just because God used this movie to teach me something, 1) that is only because He loves me and talks to me everywhere and in everything, 2) the makers of the movie didn’t necessarily intend the message, and 3) it doesn’t justify watching movies.  Just because God uses a vessel doesn’t justify the vessel.  That’s how false religion starts, and is actually more central to the message of this post than you might think.

(Warning: heavy spoilers here … so if you haven’t seen the movie and want to enjoy it without my summaries, STOP READING NOW … and read this later.)

The movie centers around an old man, Carl, who has lived a long life and is content to stay in his old house alone and stubborn against the world.  While he decides to chase after a lifelong dream, he gets “stuck” with a young boy, Russel, a talking dog and a rare bird.  Carl is constantly torn between the house he ultimately has to drag behind himself and the adventure he finds with Russel, the talking dog, and the rare bird.

All of this reminds me of a conversation I’ve had with people recently warning of a pattern that I’ve seen in the Kingdom of God.  And it is a negative pattern.

People in the Kingdom have monumental experiences, spiritual experiences where they grow and find joy and live a good life.  But God is always doing new things, and instead of continuing on as the cloud or pillar of fire moves on, they hold on to these old experiences and refuse to consider that a new adventure awaits them.

American  Christianity is one of the most segregated cultures in the world.  Not just racially but in regards to age and generation as well.  And institutions, by their very nature, can only encourage and deepen such segregation.

The generational segregation exists exactly because the older generation rests on the laurels and the experiences of the past instead of realizing their new role in what God is doing now.

We are all guilty of it, at least to a certain degree.  It is a very common temptation.  I’ve had several situations/experiences that I’ve had to let go of to move on to what God has for me next.  Personally, from Happy Hollow to the Trammell house church to our time in Korea to the Hospitality House and now on to Gwinnett Church.  And there will be things after this, as well.

Being thankful for the past and what God has done is one thing.  Holding onto it to the detriment of investing in where God has you now is another thing altogether.

In the movie, there is this amazing scene where Carl has to make a decision.  Russel decides to go to save the rare bird and leaves Carl and Carl’s house behind.  Carl looks at this adventure journal his wife had since they were kids, and he sees how she filled the blank pages with their life before she died.  And she leaves him a message: Thanks for the adventure!  Now go have a new one!

Carl needs his house to go after Russel but it won’t get off the ground.  So he dumps all of his treasured belongings to make the house lighter so he can fly after Russel to save Russel and the rare bird.

Too many of the older generation of believers are so tied to their previous experience in the Kingdom that they are bound to the past and unable to see the need for them in whatever God is doing today.  And the Church does need them.

But the Church doesn’t need the older generation to recreate what God did in the past.  They need the older generation as guides and someone to encourage the younger generation as the younger generation acts on their passion and the vision they’ve received from God.

In 1 John, the apostle makes three distinctions of his audience: young children (people glad for the forgiveness of sins), young men (those who are overcoming the evil one), and fathers (who walk with Him who is from the beginning).

There is a whole generation who is now overcoming the evil one, and they will not overcome the evil one and be saved from this wicked generation by using the past as a formula.  That is the evil of religion.  The Spirit is new and fresh; God does a new thing and desires new songs.  Yesterday’s manna rots and produces worms.

But while we shouldn’t use the past as a formula, the testimony of those who have gone before us is necessary.  Otherwise we should throw our Bibles away.

The role of the older generation in the Kingdom is to be Fathers.  This has two main aspects: first, to be a living testimony of those who “walk with Him who is from the beginning”, a testimony of a mature walk, and second, to encourage and guide the unique spiritual vision of the current generation, to be able to remind the younger generation that all is temporary and there are some principles which are timeless and true regardless of expression.

The younger generation longs for this role.  They need it.  This is the family of God, where the young realize their own temptations to spiritualize worldly things like music and buildings (or lack thereof) and structures need to be tempered.  But instead they see a testimony of an older generation that holds on tooth and nail to the past and the worldly things they associate with Christianity … so why should the young be any different?

In the movie, Carl ultimately takes ownership of the talking dog and Russel and while he loses his old life, Carl finds new satisfaction in a new adventure.

With my own son, is it being a good father to say, “This is how you grow up to become just like me,” or to say, “I want you to be whatever God wants you to be and I’ll do my best to help you realize that reality”?  I say the latter and that’s what the Church today needs.

Unfortunately, I don’t know how many older saints read my blog.  But if I could  say one thing to them, it is this:  There is no retirement in the Kingdom of God.  Roles change and evolve, and we need you.  We need your encouragement and guidance, friendship, involvement and testimony.  There is a whole younger generation that needs you to stop meeting with other older saints of God to try and relive the glory days.  Encourage the younger generation in their calling by walking through it with them.  Take ownership of this new role God has for you.  We want you and we need you.  In some ways, your true ministry might not be behind you … it might be just beginning.

It’s time for a new adventure.

Peace.

To Make One Sound

Thursday, May 6th, 2010

“… indeed it came to pass, when the trumpeters and singers were as one, to make one sound to be heard in praising and thanking the Lord, and when they lifted up their voice with the trumpets and cymbals and instruments of music, and praised the Lord, saying: ‘For He is good, for His mercy endures forever,’ that the house, the house of the Lord, was filled with a cloud, so that the priests could not continue ministering because of the cloud; for the glory of the Lord filled the house of God.”  2 Chronicles 5.13-14

As Solomon dedicates the temple he built to God, an amazing thing happens.  God manifests His presence so tangibly that there is a cloud and the priests “could not continue ministering”.  In a real way, the glory of the Lord filled the house of God.

Now the house of God is no longer in a physical place like a city or building.  God’s house is now His people.  This is the House that He has built.  No man has built nor can he.  God “dwells in temples not made with hands.”

In other words, we are His house, the home where He lives.  And God wants to fill His House with His glory.  He desires it more than any extreme revivalist could understand.

Of course in a way He already does.  I do not mean to suggest that because we do not see  certain manifestations that God does not rest there, now.  But He does seek to be known through His people, to manifest Himself in such a way that the whole earth is aware of His glory.

But something happened in this scripture before He filled the temple that Solomon built: “the trumpeters and singers were as one, to make one sound to be heard in praising and thanking the Lord …”

There is a real need for unity among the brethren before God manifests Himself in a glorious way.  True believers must lift up their voices to join in with the “one sound.”  This isn’t just something you believe or have “in your heart.”   It is a sound “to be heard.”

So what is this one sound?  Well, let’s define the source of the one sound before we answer that question.  The source of this sound is from the Spirit of God.  There is one Spirit.  While we are all individually filled and led by the Spirit, the Spirit is one.  There are not many Holy Spirits.  Only one.  The Bride of Christ is not a harem of individuals, but a singular Body betrothed to Him.  This is due to the singular Holy Spirit all who believe.

Now that we have the source, what is the sound?  The sound is worship unto God.  But of course we understand that worship is not singing alone.  Worship in the New Covenant is, even at a basic level, is your life as a “living sacrifice,” which is a life of sacrificial worship unto the Lord in obedience and love and service to the Lord and others.  This can only be possible by the Holy Spirit, what Peter calls “the divine nature” of whom we are partakers.

As challenging as that is, that is not the end of what God is waiting for.  Just as these singers and musicians all joined their worship together into one sound, so must we find others to come along side and live the life of “living sacrifice” together.  Making it “one sound.”  While I am confident in our spiritual connection and one-ness with one another through the Spirit, unity must be expressed through gathering with other saints of God.  And not just a meeting here or there, but truly living it out with one another on a day to day basis.

“Behold how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity!  It is like precious oil upon the head, running down on the beard, the beard of Aaron, running down on the edge of is garments.  It is like the dew of Hermon, descending upon the mountains of Zion;”

-and are you ready for the next verse?-

“For there the Lord commanded the blessing – life forevermore.”

If it doesn’t get more clear than that, realize that it was when the believers were “all with one accord in one place” that Pentecost happened in Acts.  And “where two or more are gathered in my name, there I am in the midst”.  Or the world “will know you’re My disciples if you love one another as I have loved you.”  How did Jesus love us?  Did He stay in Heaven to speak from there?  No, He came to live among us.  And as evidence that Jesus spoke truth, it was in Antioch “where they were first called Christians.”  By whom?  By those in the city who saw the testimony of love and righteousness so powerfully that they recognized Christ within it and called them “little Christs”, Christians.

We put a sign on a door or a website to label who we are and yet have no testimony to back it up.  The truth is if you’ve got the testimony you don’t have to label it … they’ll know.  We’ve gotten it backwards in so many ways I wonder if we know how far we have to go.

One thing before I end this here … conformity is not unity.  Diversity of gifts and roles is to be celebrated in the Body.  You are not to be conformed but “transformed.”  There’s a difference.  And freedom is given for certain convictions in regards to some things – what to eat or not eat, days to consecrate, etc.  But these are not to be placed as a burden on the entire Body, because under the New Covenant we do now worship with worldly or fleshly things but through love and righeousness/obedience.

There is also a diversity of the Spirit working through you that must also be celebrated and acknowledged:

“Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit.  There are differences of ministries, but the same Lord.  And there are diversities of activities, but it is the same God who works all in all.  But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the profit of all …”  1 Corinthians 12.4-7

One sound to be heard for the profit of all.

If this isn’t making sense at all … that’s okay.  Love one another and it will all work out.

Peace.

The Wounded and Healing of Naaman

Monday, May 3rd, 2010

People get wounded in life.  This could be from a number of different sources, and one of the nice aspects of the Body of Christ is a lot of wounded people actually get desperate enough to fully embrace the Truth and live it with all their heart.  The “tax collectors and prostitutes” entering the Kingdom of Heaven first and all that.  God is in the redemption business and He loves a good story that glorifies Himself.

Of course once wounded people come into the Church, there is some healing that needs to be done.  That is okay because the Church is uniquely gifted to heal people, physically, emotionally, and spiritually, because we have the Spirit of God.  And with God nothing is impossible.  Sometimes this healing takes a short amount of time, and sometimes things must be endured over a longer period to build character and bring things to completion, but either way, the Church is the perfect place to facilitate that.

It is therefore the cause of great sorrow to God that the Body He has designed to be a place of healing is the cause of abuse.

That doesn’t mean that every time someone feels “hurt” by the church that the church does something wrong.  The “rich young ruler” might have felt very “hurt” by Jesus, but Jesus was not being harsh nor cruel but redemptive in His design to answer the question, “What must I do to be saved?”

But along with the authority and power to redeem comes the ability to abuse.  It is always correlative.  And it happens, and has happened.

What is so tragic about this is that the healing must come, again, through the Church.  It can come no other way.  The wounded seek to run or hide or become isolated or even codependent somehow, but the answer is within the Body of Christ.

It is difficult for those genuinely wounded by the Church to hear this, which is completely understandable.  But the answer is not in bitterness or division or isolation, but experiencing the proper testimony that the Body was meant to be.

Granted, that can be hard to find, but that doesn’t negate the truth of it.

I’m reminded of Elisha and Naaman, from 2 Kings 5.  Naaman was the commander of the Syrian army, and Elisha was the prophet in Israel.  Naaman has leprosy and hears about Elisha from his Israelite servant.  Naaman seeks out Elisha for his healing, with money and everything, in a letter to the king of Israel.  The king of Israel fails to have faith, and instead freaks out because he thinks Syria would get offended and there might be armed conflict once Naaman isn’t healed.

But Elisha hears about it and says to the king of Israel, “Why have you torn your clothes?  Please let him come to me, and he shall know there is a prophet in Israel.”

Elisha sends a messenger to Naaman and tells him, “Go and wash in the Jordan seven times, and your flesh shall be restored to you, and you shall be clean.”

Naaman actually gets furious at this.  He thought there would just be this wave of the hand and the prophet would heal him.  Or he thought about all the rivers in his home country that are “better than all the rivers of Israel.”  And so he “turned and went away in a rage.”

But his servants (this dude had some cool servants) say to him, “If the prophet had told you to do something great, would you not have done it?  How much more then, when he says, ‘wash and be clean’?”

So Naaman obeyed.  And he was made clean.

As an aside, Elisha refused to take any money for it, by the way, even though Naaman offered.  But Elisha’s servant runs Naaman down and takes money for it.  And then Elisha’s servant gets leprosy.

The truth is that the Church, both local and universal, has been designed to be the place for healing.  And by place, I do not mean the structure you meet in.  The only holy place left on earth is the gathering of those who love Him more than anything, who gather in His name.  Where they gather, there He is in the midst.

Naaman dipped seven times.  You may not see healing immediately or soon.  But if you are involved in a fellowship that receives you, encourages you, and yes, even corrects you in love, endure with them.  Invest in the people (not programs or institutions) and you’ll see eternal reward.

And I included the aside about Elisha and Naaman because the Church heals and redeems without seeking anything from the redeemed.  They don’t do it for earthly profit but for eternal reward.  There is a consequence for seeing godliness as a means of earthly gain.  Love is given freely.  It isn’t love unless that’s true.

As much as God is in sorrow over the fellowships that wound where they should redeem, it brings God joy to know of churches that can (and do) say, “Please let the wounded come to us and they will know there is a church in this place.”  And I rejoice with Him.

If you don’t know of a fellowship that is healthy and brings healing and restoration and redemption … well, I know of a couple, even though many surely exist beyond what I am aware.  I’ll always try to encourage your inclusion wherever God would lead you.

Peace.