We’ve been out of town for almost two weeks straight … some interesting posts coming up, I think …
Before I begin my explanation of the Bono Litmus Test, let me say that I do not know Bono, and I am not attempting to disparage him in any way. But he has become quite the figurehead for artistic liberal activism. He’s been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize, knighted by the Queen, and named Times Person of the Year.
Therefore, since Bono has become this immediately recognizable figurehead for liberal activism around the world, I use his name as a collective image for celebrity (aka, “cool”) activism.
A certain movement among younger Christians is what I would like to call the Bono Litmus Test. This is really easy to understand. A young Christian looks at a certain issue and thinks, “What would Bono say about this?” or “What would Bono do about this?”
Let’s give a couple examples. Let’s say a young Christian reads a quote from Mother Theresa. They agree with this quote. “Does Bono think Mother Theresa is cool?” The resounding answer is yes, so they can buy her books and read her stuff and quote her at will. That is “cool.”
But what if this young Christian sees a quote by Ann Coulter, a popular conservative writer. Her quote may be true and based completely on fact, but “would Bono think Ann Coulter is cool?” The answer is a resounding no, so they shake their head sadly when anyone mentions her name, refuse to listen to her “ranting and raving” on Fox News, and tend to agree with all the liberals (like Bono) that she is hate speech!
See how this goes? There are several issues that young Christians feel uncomfortable talking about or taking a stand on because Bono would really disapprove. They don’t feel that they can talk about how homosexuality is a sin, or abortion is murder, or how divorce is a main contributor to poverty. While all of these things are valid and important, this new “relevant” generation won’t discuss it because Bono might frown upon it.
On the other hand, they feel completely comfortable voting Democrat or being free about what people do sexually or otherwise because Bono would think that’s pretty cool. They can believe that rich people are the enemy and AIDS is NOT a homosexual disease because Bono would completely approve.
The problem with this should be apparent. We seem to have a whole generation of Christians choosing issues based on what the readers of Rolling Stone would agree with. If our spirituality in any way offends these defenders of “cool”, then it invalidates our spirituality and any truth connected to their offense. They call those people who offend them “fundamentalists” or (gasp!) “conservative Christians.”
For any Christian, what mainstream artists think is cool should never enter the equation. They should not be the benchmark of what is true, what is right, and what we are going to talk about. God should be that motivator, benchmark and deciding factor. Not that we intend to offend or cater to the world at all. Our only consideration should be what the Lord thinks is right and relevant.
Unfortunately, many just aren’t willing to be seen as “uncool” or to be rejected by mainstream entertainment figures.
Just shakin the tree a little …
Peace.