Archive for June, 2007

Some Notes on Being Relevant

Tuesday, June 26th, 2007

Been thinking about something for a while, and thought I might share my thoughts … It starts with this verse:

“Adulterers and adulteresses! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Whoever therefore wants to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God.” James 4:4

Yeah, I know. Pretty harsh. But if we believe it, isn’t it worth looking at?

The Church has, on some level, always struggled with their relationship to the world. They are not the world, but they live in it and are called to it. Over the last decade or so, the modern American Body of Christ has centered this discussion around one word: relevant.

In order to spread the gospel and fulfill the Great Commission, some interaction with the world is necessary. Different Christians and groups of believers have different views on how to handle this. I don’t have time or space to address every perspective on this continuum. Suffice it to say we have communes and compounds for the separation, Christian night clubs for the immersion, and everything inbetween.

In order for the world to hear the gospel of Christ, there must be some shared cultural considerations. A common language is key for communication. Within that common language, adaptations must be allowed for since languages constantly change. Idioms and phrases are added or lost, cultural definitions changed. If we spoke in Middle English (for whatever reason), most people would not be able to understand even simple concepts.

So we return to the concept of relevance. Defined, relevance is “relation to the matter at hand; also: practical and social applicability.”

The modern idea of relevance takes its cues from the popular culture or the culture with which we hope to communicate, more the second part of that definition. Punks need a punk-looking dude to minister to them. A CEO needs a Christian businessman to relate to. You get the picture. Movies, music, and other media are seen as necessary elements to effectively communicating the truth of Christ.

As I’ve spoken of before, I don’t see this type of relevance considered in the New Testament. In fact, while this type of relevance is by no means sinful and could be the work of God at times, it has a real danger to it: the attempt to befriend the world.

More on that later.

First, let’s discuss biblical relevance. John the Baptist had a very relevant ministry. He was sent to prepare the way for Christ, an event very close to his own time. It was very relevant for that generation. “Repent, for the Kingdom of God is at hand.”

Of course, John didn’t dress particularly well or make a lot of friends in high places, but I would still say he was pretty relevant.

Jesus always addressed the real issue with people, sometimes harshly. Their sin, their need to be healed, their hypocrisy, His very presence were all very relevant to those He spoke and ministered to.

Of course, after speaking, people tried to kill Him or just left Him in droves.

Peter, on the Day of Pentecost, addressed the supernatural tongues the city of Jerusalem witnessed that morning, concluding that they were to be saved from this “evil generation.” While thousands were converted that day, Peter and the other apostles were ultimately persecuted and executed.

In other words, true biblical relevance will lead the world to hate you.

It is difficult to save people from an “evil generation” when we’re trying to be and look just like them.

Biblical relevance is the specific call to repent to that generation and those within that culture.

The only real cultural consideration is to make sure that our cultural habits don’t get in the way of THAT MESSAGE.

How might our modern view of relevance then be dangerous? First, it is not in styles or cultural expressions that we err. It is the message we must change in order to befriend the world. Instead of repentance (not the word alone but the true spiritual idea and concept of it), we approach grace as a means to be saved and yet remain unchanged in behavior.

Secondly, our ministries and assemblies become so worldly that no one can see the difference between the Church and the world, and we are satisfied with that, if not proud of it. This makes “returning” to the world extremely easy for thsoe who would be believers, although it could be argued that they never really left the world in the first place.

Thirdly, and maybe more important, if not foundational, we are more concerned with what the world says about us than what God’s opinion is. God doesn’t have an opinion, though. It is the only truth. The fact that we forsake this truth for the opinion of an evil generation is tragically expressive of who we really worship.

The challenge here is not to change our dress or music style, but rather what we say, what we do, and who we do it for. That alone makes us relevant. Were not those on the Titanic who tried to get people into lifeboats while the liner was sinking relevant? I would say so. Nothing else but truth in love makes us relevant.

Christ doesn’t need our help to make Him cool or attractive enough. If we really believed He alone was truth and had what all men need, would we even try?

Peace.

The Church According to Mary Poppins — Part 5

Friday, June 22nd, 2007

Jane and Michael are lost and ultimately found by Bert, who is dirty and grimy from his work as a chimney sweep. He carries them home. Then Bert is recruited to clean the chimney at the Banks’ home. He teaches the children of the joys of being a chimney sweep, how sweeps are the luckiest people because they see London from the rooftops. No one else gets to do that.

The children are then sucked up the chimney while Bert is showing them the pull of the wind across the rooftops. Bert and Mary Poppins follow. The whole group them explores the rooftops and sees London as the sunsets, a beautiful sight. Before their gallavanting, however, Poppins gets out her makeup kit and puts MORE soot on her face. At one point, Bert does not see how they can go on, but Poppins magically enables them to reach even higher.

Bert, Poppins, and the children return to the Banks’ roof and other sweeps pop up and spontaneously sing and dance. Poppins joins them while the children watch.

As the dance ends, Bert ends up talking to Mr. Banks, sharing Bert’s perspective on his problems in an indirect way. Mr. Banks is enlightened by Bert as to what is right.

As Bert represents the poor, the poor have a unique and higher perspective. “The poor are rich in faith.” The poor even know how to tap into the invisible pull that takes you to that higher perspective. The Church chooses to identify with the poor, intentionally putting on the dirty “make-up” to help them feel comfortable. This does not mean sin. This means dressing down instead of dressing up, living below your means instead of above them. The Church should do this.

The Church should also be willing to celebrate and mourn with the poor.

The rich, and the world, will not be enlightened until they see the world from the perspective of the poor.

The Church, however, isn’t satisfied with the perspective of the poor alone. That is only a starting point. She seeks to take even them higher with the supernatural foundation of grace and the Holy Spirit.

In his last conversation with Poppins, Mr. Banks demands she explain everything. Her response? “I never explain anything.”

The church doesn’t need to defend herself. She has a Husband for that. Her actions stand alone.

Ultimately, Mr. Banks has to face the music. He is called in to the bank and fired. His response? He proudly takes full responsibility for his son. He speaks Poppins’ word and sings her song.

Now he has learned what Poppins had to teach him. He responds as she would. He returns home with a restored kite broken at the beginning of the movie. He takes the family out flying kites after singing and dancing through the house. The whole household follows him with joy. It bears noting that while focused on loving his family, his feminist wife follows him and he is rewarded with a better job.

Just as Banks faced his trial alone, many believers must do the same. The Church is not a babysitter. We have to prove our relation to the Body of Christ by responding as she would respond in those situations.

One of the main ministries of the Church is to return spiritual authority to the fathers. Raising and teaching children is not the responsibility of the Church but the fathers. The Church will and must assist and encourage, but it is the father who must fulfill his calling as a leader and teacher.

” … the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord. And he will turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the hearts of the children to the fathers, lest I come and strike the earth with a curse.” — Malachi 4

These are the last words of the Old Testament, both literally and chronologically. Next comes the New Testament and the revelation of the New Covenant and the Church. This is the restoration the Church must endeavor to bring to save the earth from God’s wrath. This is our destiny and calling.

At the end of the movie, the wind changes and Mary flies away, her calling fulfilled. Before she leaves, her umbrella companion chirps up and says, “Not even a goodbye. It is as if they love their father more than you.”

“That is as it should be,” she replies.

Yes. It is.

Peace.

Quote of the Week 6.23.07

Friday, June 22nd, 2007

Another one from Bonhoeffer’s Letters and Papers from Prison. Towards the end of his life, he was planning on writing a book about “religionless” Christianity, boiled down to its basics without the traditions and ceremony attatched to it. Too bad he never wrote it, although his notes and outline were incredible. I loved this quote from his “Conclusions”:

“The Church is the Church only when it exists for others. To make a start, it should give away all its property to those in need. The clergy must live solely on the free-will offerings of their congregations, or possibly engage in some secular calling. The Church must share in the secular problems of ordinary human life, not dominating, but helping and serving. It must tell men of every calling what it means to live in Christ, to exist for others. In particular, our own Church will have to take the field against the vices of hubris, power-worship, envy, and humbug, as the roots of all evil. It will have to speak of moderation, purity, trust, loyalty, constancy, patience, discipline, humility, contentment, and modesty. It must not underestimate the importance of human example …. ; it is not abstract argument, but example, that gives its word emphasis and power.”

Peace.

The Church According to Mary Poppins — Part 4

Thursday, June 21st, 2007

Mary Poppins puts the children to bed the night before their big day with their father and teaches them to notice something on their way to the bank. There is an old woman who sits on the steps to the cathedral and cries out, “Feed the birds, toppence a bag.” For a minimal amount, she sells bread crumbs to feel hungry birds. Poppins sings a song about this woman and how the saints look down and smile when someone shows they care.

This presents one of the primary messages of the Church: feed the poor. Heaven is pleased when you do. The old waman sitting on the steps is also symbolic. In order to ascend to the House of God, His Kingdom, you must give to the poor.

Did not Jesus say so? “Don’t lay up treasure on earth. Lay up treasure in heaven.” How do you lay up treasure in heaven? Giving to the poor. In Matthew 6, Jesus clearly shows the person laying up treasure on earth as a non-follower of Christ and those laying up treasure in Heaven as true believers, full of light.

It is funny how we teach this as optional or suggestive in our American culture.

Michael is faced with the same dilemma many in the American Church face. He brings toppence of his own, willingly, to feed the birds. He is told by his father of a more sensible use of that money. At the bank, the financial authorities stoically try to convince young Michael that feeding the birds is throwing the money away. They have better investments that consist of expanding the British empire.

Michael is not convinced. His compassion and the teaching of Mary Poppins ring in his heart. He grabs his money from the hands of the bank and runs off because he wants to feed the birds. Chaos ensues at the bank.

There is no greater investment than giving to the poor. All other investments carry risk and are only temporary at best. You will not enjoy worldly investments in heaven, and if you are a follower of Christ, you will be there for eternity. Heavenly treasures are a sure thing, and you get to enjoy it for eternity. Any other investment is idiocy, comparitively. If the Church loved people, they would teach them about this type of investment.

But it takes a child-like faith to believe it. Those distracted by the world and “mature” in worldly ways will not see this. Unless you become like a child …

A quick note on Michael, the boy with the same name of the highest angel.. His name means, “who is like God?” … the answer? Those who give to others in need.

to be continued …. (last one tomorrow!)

Sounding Off 6.20.07

Thursday, June 21st, 2007

Bush vetoed the bill for embryonic stem cell research … and I am glad.

As I’ve stated before, I’m not the biggest Bush fan out there, but thank God he is in power to keep such legislation from passing through.

Why is this such a big deal? Well, most of you know that most of the embryos they will use are aborted babies. That is one problem … at least for me. The other problem is this: embryonic stem cells have shown NO evidence of helping anything.

But stem cells have. I don’t care if every celebrity parades a handicapped person before us and begs, it doesn’t change the fact that stem cells are the ones that are really making the difference. But you don’t hear about that on CNN or the Yahoo headlines before you check your email. The focus is always on EMBRYONIC stem cell research.

It is further proof that certain people who are considered liberal or Democrat have an agenda. What is that agenda? you may ask.

Part of the problem is that they feel the need for population control. They can’t kill s to make this happen, yet, so they come up with agendas and policies that support their idea.

One of those agendas is unborn children. Another one is the fear mongering of global warming (based, in their minds, upon what we are doing to the environment and global overpopulation).

Of course, all you will hear in the media is how Bush is anti-choice and doesn’t care about handicapped people, if you haven’t heard it already. There will be pictures of Christopher Reeve, and Michael J. Fox might actually make another commercial and tell everyone how horrible Bush is because he doesn’t care about curing disease.

Again, not to say Bush is the answer to all problems, not even close, but I respect a man who acts for truth.

Peace.

The Church According to Mary Poppins — Part 3

Wednesday, June 20th, 2007

The whole household is transformed by Mary Poppins’ presence. The cook and the maid sing over their work, sharing kindness to one another instead of squabbling. The children bring their mother flowers instead of being a pain.

The only one unhappy with all this joy is the father, the one who acted for change in the first place. He tries to contain this joy in his house. The children attempt to share their joy with him, even sharing the new word Poppins taught them, but it is just gibberish to him. All this only makes Mr. Banks critical of Mary Poppins.

As the Church brings true change, she exhibits a higher authority. Worldly authorities feel threatened by this and persecute the Church. She does not bring the type of change the world expects or demands, and her Word is confusing to worldly minds.

Mr. Banks decides to have a talk with Poppins about all this nonsense. Again, Poppins is the one in control of the exchange. Mary puts the children back in the hands of Mr. Banks and has him take his children to work with him. In speaking with Jane and Michael later, they beg her not to go. When she explains she is going nowhere, they had assumed she was “sacked (fired)” by their father.

She stronly states: “Sacked! I am never sacked.”

In standing before the Roman authority, Pilate says, “Don’t you know the power I have over you?” Jesus’ response: “You would have no authority unless my father gave it to you.” Christ said elsewhere: “No one takes my life from me. I give it up.”

As Christ’s representative on earth, the Church carries a higher authority. The Church is in control because our Father is in control. We leave of our own accord, not when told to leave. I’m also reminded of when Paul and Silas were still in the jail after the doors were opened. They stayed and blessed the jailor’s whole household, refusing to even leave the jailor’s house until the Roman authority ASKED them.

Man nor his authority controls our destiny; only God can do that.

to be continued …

The Church According to Mary Poppins — Part 2

Tuesday, June 19th, 2007

Upon meeting the children, they immediately recognize something magical about Mary Poppins. She slides UP the bannister. She carries only one bag, but her supply is endless. When one asked how long she will stay with the family, she answers, “Only until the wind changes.”

The world should immediately recognize the supernatural and miraculous in the Church. This should be instantly evident. The Church also has very few belongings of her own, but always possesses exactly what she needs. Her only commitment is to obey God, to follow the Spirit, the wind, and even she does not know where God will send her next. She signs no contract, makes no promises.

The first thing Mary Poppins teaches them is to clean their room. But she teaches them a song that enables them to work with joy.

While the Church values childlike innocence, she also values living up to responsibility. But the Church helps men and women find joy in the most menial of tasks by working for the Lord in everything.

Then the adventures begin. Poppins is both spontaneous and practical. Coming upon her friend, Bert, he is finishing his sidewalk chalk drawings. After a short conversation, Poppins is convinced by childlike excitement to enter the chalk drawings and have a “holiday.” During the holiday, however, Poppins shows restraint, wisdom and character.

The Church must learn to be spontaneous as opportunities present themselves, even to participate in joyous occasions. But those spontaneous opportunities are still subject to wisdom and righteousness. She never loses the purity of her character. Although spontaneous and sometimes fun, the Church is not led by her own s.

A quick note on Bert: He is representative of the poor. Of all characters in the movie, he knows who Poppins is and what she is about, even saying, “It’s a jolly holiday with Mary.” Bert is from the lowest class, a chimney sweep, almost an untouchable in British society at the time. But he is transformed into a gentleman in her presence, not in actual station (he must return to his actual poverty), but in how she honors and treats him.

The poor should find such a haven in the Church. The poor should feel such joy in fellowship with the Church. More on that later.

On this chalk-drawing holiday, Poppins teaches them how to race with confidence but not recklessly. They race on inanimate horses. She teaches them a new word they have never heard, a word to use when they don’t know what to say.

The Church should intentionally use situations to teach others how to run the race of the kingdom with confidence but not recklessly. The vessel we use to race with is flesh, crucified with Christ. We race as men walking. The Church also teaches people how to speak in a new way, to allow the Holy Spirit to fill your mouth whne you don’t know what to say.

In general, Poppins teaches with song. A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down. Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious. The Church is to teach in singing from the heart.

To be continued ….

The Church According to Mary Poppins — Part 1

Monday, June 18th, 2007


Being the parent of a son who is almost 2, I get to watch some interesting programs. Of course, I only allow Micah to watch certain things coupled with his tastes. We also attempt to restrict his viewing time, so his choices are naturally limited.

My mother sat with Micah one day and put the Disney classic Mary Poppins into the DVD player, hoping to entertain Micah for 10-15 minutes.

He watched most of it. He loved it, which is cool with me because I’ve always loved that flick myself.

So I’ve seen Mary Poppins a few times over the last couple months. Upon watching it in the mountains a couple weeks ago, God enlightened me with an interesting concept.

Mary Poppins is symbolic of the Church.

Now, as I say this, I do not mean to be critical, as some of you rolling your eyes might think (I can see you!).

I am serious. As a fictional character, Mary Poppins is symbolic of the Church, both as she is and as she should be, an ideal of sorts.

This week I will concentrate on the important symbolic aspects of Mary Poppins. Since the only full picture of the Church can be found in the scripture, this will naturally be somewhat incomplete, but I feel there are some important revelations here.

The story begins with an upper class British family with a problem: their nanny quits. George Banks, the father, takes it upon himself to get involved. The children, Jane and Michael, have their own idea of what is needed and share their requests with Mr. Banks, which he summarily ignores.

While Mr. Banks is somewhat misguided, it is important to note that Mary Poppins doesn’t really get involved until the authority of the household makes an effort towards change.

The Church is many things, but she finds it difficult to enact ideal change when the head of the family, appointed by God, is apathetic or hostile to her ministry.

On the day interviews are being held, a strong wind blows through and does two things: removes all other nannies and brings in the true solution, Mary Poppins. When she is interviewed, Poppins does not even attempt to submit to Mr. Banks’ standard of what she should be. She does not even allow Mr. Banks to hire her. She sets up a trial period. She is the one totally in control.

While the efforts of the fathers initiate change, the Church is not submitted to the authority of earthly fathers. She is brought in by the wind. In John 3, Jesus tells us that no one knows where the wind comes from or where it goes. So it is with those who follow the Spirit. The Church is controlled and directed by an unseen force, the Holy Spirit. Just as only one nanny will do, there is only one Church, one representative of Christ in the earth. There are no other options. Only the Church is designed to express the world.

And since the Church shows up in obedience to the Spirit only, she does so on her own terms. She cannot be controlled or manipulated by those she ministers to. She is the one with the authority of Christ as her head.

And Poppins is much closer to the desires of the child than the standards of the , just as Christ stated it takes the innocence and purity of a child to enter the Kingdom. “From the mouth of s” so to speak.

to be continued …

Example of Paul #10 — Giving Up Salvation

Monday, June 11th, 2007

I speak the truth in Christ—I am not lying, my conscience confirms it in the Holy Spirit— I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, those of my own race, the people of Israel. Theirs is the adoption as sons; theirs the divine glory, the covenants, the receiving of the law, the temple worship and the promises. Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of Christ, who is God over all, forever praised! Romans 9:1-5

This will be the last Example of Paul … a couple new series coming up.

For many, this is one of the most disturbing passages of scripture. Understandably so.

Only two people in the scripture express such a desperate emotion. First we have Moses. While God was about to get rid of the whole nation of Israel and make a new chosen people out of Moses, Moses begs God to have mercy on Israel. He even tells God to “write my name out of your book,” which many argue isn’t a true rejection of salvation, but nonetheless, seems pretty extreme to me. Of course, God does have mercy and repents of His plan to wipe Israel from the face of the earth.

Here in Romans, we have Paul the Apostle, the messenger of the Gospel to the Gentiles, lamenting over his own people, the Jews. He is so distraught, he even testifies that he COULD wish himself accursed so they could be saved.

Paul was saddened by the fact that the chosen people had rejected the savior that came through their line. Although many of the early Christians were Jews, the majority of the Jewish nation had rejected Jesus. This was tragic to Paul, who understood more than most both the rejection and salvation of Jesus.

Therefore, it were possible, he would give up his own salvation so that a whole people could know Jesus.

This is deep compassion. Most of us understand loving and caring deeply for our own people, whether racially or otherwise. We may even understand giving our physical lives for a cause. But to give up our eternal destiny, as well?

Only Jesus was ever able to experience this in reality. In choosing to do His Father’s will and lay His life on the cross, He was also choosing to take on the sin of the world, thereby taking on the full wrath of God. As the sun went black and God turned His back on His only Son, Jesus cried out, “Father, why have you forsaken me?” Only Jesus has felt the result of choosing to give up His righteous, holy place for others. Because Christ acted out of obedience, Jesus also enjoyed His joy and reward from the Father.

And because Jesus became this ultimate sacrifice, we cannot. Hence, Paul uses the word COULD to describe his deep compassion for others. This wasn’t just flight of fancy, either. Paul tells us that the Holy Spirit bore witness to the truth of his statement.

In the sense of giving up our salvation, Jesus’ sacrifice was enough … more than enough. We can partake in His suffering and sacrifice on one level, even the giving up of our own physical lives for others, as we should, but we can never substitute our salvation for another, even a whole group.

But we can wish. This is the compassion of Christ in our hearts by the Holy Spirit. If it is genuine, this compassion for others is an expression of our transformation into being more like Christ. This is the level Paul attained. He was willing not just to give up his own life, but even his own salvation, if it were possible, in order to see the salvation of others.

The gap between Paul’s compassion for others and my own is the Grand Canyon. If we were truly even like Paul, as he was like Christ, our compassion for the lost would routinely overwhelm us to tears. Remember how Christ wept for Jerusalem? When is the last time you wept for the lost, in any sense? Oh, Christians are great at either telling people they are sinners or just shrugging their shoulders in utter apathy, but we are deficient in our compassion for the lost.

Remember Jesus was considered a “man of sorrows, acquainted with grief.” If the Church is His Body, should we not also weep for the eternal condition of those around us? The fact that we don’t means one of two things: either we aren’t saved ourselves or we don’t know God well enough to even imagine what it would be like without His grace. I’m not sure there’s much of a difference, to be honest.

Maybe instead of Christian comedians we should have professional lamenters, people whose job it is to lead the Church to tears, to share in God’s deep heart.

Actually, we do. They are the true prophets. You’ll just probably never really hear about them or know one in our American Christian culture.

Peace.

Very Sad News, Indeed

Friday, June 8th, 2007

For those of you who knew Harry Walker, he was the best.

He was a Master Sergeant in the Air Force, just getting ready to retire after his long service in the Armed Forces. He spent a year in Korea. He faithfully attended the Hospitality House, the ministry Becca and I headed up for a year and a half before our exit. Harry was incredibly supportive of us. I’ve never met anyone like him. He was quite the man of God.

Becca and I were invited to his “going-away” party. The party was on base at a Colonel’s house. Master Sergeant is the 2nd highest enlisted rank you can achieve in the Air Force. Next up is Chief Master Sergeant, and very few ever get to that level, even after more than twenty years in the Air Force. This should give you some indication of his level of worldly success.

At this “going-away” party, just a week or so before he left to be with his family after a separation of almost 12 months, individual after individual rose and showered Harry with encouraging words and praise as we ate an incredible meal catered and paid for by the Colonel (this isn’t necessarily common). They even made me get up and say something.

Harry got to speak last. I’ll never forget what he said. He attributed every aspect of his success, and the success of those in his care, to prayer. Harry explained how he would ask for the list of soldiers under his care every week, updated, because he prayed for them every day. He prayed for those under his care and those he was responsible to. Harry spoke of a mystical power in deliberate prayer that, honestly, convicted me as someone seen by others as a “minister.” In the midst of several people who were not Christians, Harry gave all the praise to Jesus Christ.

I honestly didn’t know how the House would continue after he left. Harry was that integral to our community. Every enlisted man wished he was their leader. Harry had this unique knack for rebuking you harshly, and you somehow thanked him for it because you knew first of all that he was correct, and second of all that he loved you. Harry told everyone exactly what he felt they needed to know, regardless of their rank or position.

Harry also just loved on people. He smiled and laughed with the best of them. He was like this big teddy bear most of the time.

The House did survive and continue to thrive, of course … probably because Harry was praying for us. I missed him, though. I miss him still.

And I will continue to miss him until eternity. I received an email from Fred Stock, the director of the House before us, that Harry Walker had a heart attack and died on May 30. You can read his obituary here.

He left behind a beautiful wife and two adopted boys (just an example of his big heart). Pray for them if you think of it. She is a true widow in need of all we can give.

Harry — and you can bet all your material goods on this one — is in a much better place, cheering us on.

Peace.