Archive for December, 2006

Sounding Off

Saturday, December 23rd, 2006

I want to see the Nativity movie. I’ve heard it is good, and it does look interesting.

But a recent commercial almost ruined it for me. This was an actual commercial for the movie. It started out with a listing of media headlines about how this nativity set was taken down here or Christmas was banned here, you know, the supposed “War on Christmas” stuff. Then we are told that if we want to support Christmas, go see the movie.

I mean, it was just like a political ad, like someone was running for office. “This guy does all this horrible stuff, so vote for me!” There was no mention of the actual quality of the film. Kinda sad to me.

And yes, even though it is the only news channel I can stomach, it was on the Fox News Channel. Come on, guys …

Anyway, Happy Christmas!

peace.

Quote of the Week

Thursday, December 21st, 2006

In the spirit of Christmas, another longer quote for you here.

This is from the poet Kahlil Gibran, introduced to me by my mother. My favorite work of his is The Prophet, which is very spiritual but not necessarily Christian. However, God winks at me often in his writings. Gibran also wrote another collection of poems called Jesus the Son of Man which is excellent.

In The Prophet, a prophet is leaving a city he has lived in for twelve years. Before he leaves, though, the town elders and his friends entreat him to leave them with his wisdom. They ask him questions and he answers with deep thoughts, of course.

This is the Prophet’s response to their question about giving,

“Then said a rich man, Speak to us of Giving.
And he answered:
You give but little when you give of your possessions.
It is when you give of yourself that you truly give.
For what are your possessions but things you keep and guard for fear you may need them tomorrow?
And tomorrow, what shall tomorrow bring to the overprudent dog burying bones in the trackless sand as he follows the pilgrims to the holy city?
And what is fear of need but need itself?
Is not dread of thirst when your well is full, the thirst that is unquenchable?

There are those who give little of the much which they have — and they give it for recognition and their hidden desire makes their gifts unwholesome.
And there are those who have little and give it all.
These are the believers in life and the bounty of life, and their coffer is never empty.
There are those who give with joy, and that joy is their reward.
And there are those who give with pain, and that pain is their baptism.
And there are those who give and know not pain in giving, nor do they seek joy, nor give with mindfulness of virtue.
They give as in yonder valley the myrtle breathes its fragrance into space.
Through the hands of such as these God speaks, and from behind their eyes He smiles upon the earth.

It is well to give when asked, but it is better to give unasked, through understanding;
And to the open-handed the search for one who shall receive is joy greater than giving.
And is there aught you would withhold?
All you have shall some day be given;
Therefore give now, that the season of giving may be yours and not your inheritors’.

You often say, “I would give, but only to the deserving.”
The trees in your orchard say not so, nor the flocks in your pasture.
They give that they may live, for to withhold is to perish.
Surely he who is worthy to receive his days and his nights, is worthy of all else from you.
And he who has deserved to drink from the ocean of life deserves to fill his cup from your little stream.
And what desert greater shall there be, than that which lies in the courage and the confidence, nay the charity, of receiving?
And who are you that men should rend their bosom and unveil their pride, that you may see their worth and their pride unabashed?
See first that you yourself deserve to be a giver, and an instrument of giving.
For in truth it is life that gives unto life — while you, who deem yourself a giver, are but a witness.

And you receivers — and you are all receivers — assume no weight of gratitude, lest you lay a yoke upon yourself and upon him who gives.
Rather rise together with the giver on his gifts as on wings;
For to be overmindful of your debt, is to doubt his generosity who has the freehearted earth for a mother, and God for a father.”

Some lines that really get to me:
“They give that they may live, for to withhold is to perish.”
and
“See first that you yourself deserve to be a giver, and an instrument of giving.
For in truth it is life that gives unto life — while you, who deem yourself a giver, are but a witness.”
and
“And is there aught you would withhold?
All you have shall some day be given;
Therefore give now, that the season of giving may be yours and not your inheritors’.”

For those of us who have been given Christ, we have been given bounty unending. How shall we not be held accountable one day for what we withhold?

Don’t give because its Christmas. Give because that is what you were created to be. And it won’t matter the holiday, only that God smiles upon the earth through you.

What a gift given to us. Share it.

Peace.

Introduction to New Series — The Example of Paul

Monday, December 18th, 2006

“Join with others in following my example, brothers, and take note of those who live according to the pattern we gave you.” Philippians 3:17

“Follow my example, as I follow the example of Christ.” 1 Corinthians 1:11

The next series I have on my heart is to tackle what the example of Paul truly is. Many say they follow his example or say they want to, but I wonder what we would look like if we truly did.

Of course, some will say, “Well, he was an apostle, and we can’t follow his example.” But we have two scriptures above that prove otherwise (there are more … we’ll get to them, too). Even though Paul was an apostle, he made it clear that all should follow his example. In fact, I believe it was because of his authority over others that he felt the responsibility to be an example for others to follow.

I’m not sure how far we’ll get with this one, but the blogs should be a little shorter. I doubt they’ll be any less challenging, however.

Peace.

Conclusion to “Things I Can’t Find in the Bible”

Sunday, December 17th, 2006

Wow.

Looking back over the last year, I began with a handful of things on my heart to share about and had to stop myself with 20. This wasn’t necessarily the best series for me to try to tackle on a blog since the topics were big and took a lot of discussion from me. At least, I had a lot to say about each one. It would make a better book, although these blog articles would only be skeletons of the larger essays I would write with more research and less rambling. But I would like to put it together in one … someday soon.

Let’s take a look back at the 20 things I decided to address.

1. Friendship Evangelism
2. Asking Jesus into Your Heart
3. Christian Entertainment
4. Seminary Education
5. Denominations
6. Dressing Up For Church
7. Priest Class Under the New Covenant
8. Ordination of Man
9. Political Action
10. Having a Building
11. Registered Membership
12. Christians as Sinners
13. Day of the Week
14. Specific Ministry Positions
15. Preparing for Sermons
16. Order of Worship
17. Christian Tithing
18. Material Wealth as a Sign of Faith
19. End of the Gifts of the Spirit
20. Changing the World

Looking back, it seems like I have systematically questioned what many consider foundational Christianity. Maybe I have. But ultimately I only want to experience the complete freedom in Christ that results in great joy, power, authority and peace. I find that greatly lacking in most of the Christians I meet from day to day.

Actually, I kinda spoke too early. I not only want to experience complete freedom in Christ myself, but I also long to see the Body of Christ experience the complete freedom that exists in loving her Husband and Him alone.

I find another thing looking back that I must address. I must apologize for where I might have unduly judged another brother in Christ. Speaking the Truth is honorable, and I believe that God put each one of these topics on my heart, but as married people may learn, it is not just WHAT you say but HOW you say it. I am to speak the truth in love, and there may have been times when I overstepped the bounds of judging someone who is not my servant. And you step precariously when you judge one of God’s servants too harshly. Just because my words may be right does not make my expression of them right … it is something I am still learning and may for some time to come. God is patient with me.

What I hope to point people to is not judging one another and causing more division. I hope to point people more to Christ and the freedom from religious acts to true righteousness and joy. This can only result in a more healthy body and a better expression of Christ to a lost and dying world.

Of course, while I hope to not cause division, I know that I make this call from some place outside the camp, as it speaks about at the end of Hebrews. And to fully grab a hold of Christ we must often release what is already in our grasp … it’s that whole repentance thing. And if you look at that list above, I have found many in the Body of Christ who hold on to those things with a grip … pun intended. And if you cannot support those things with the Bible you claim to believe, that seems like a problem to me.

But I am one man, one vessel who has blessedly found kindred hearts along the way that look me in the eye and comfort me by saying, “no, you’re not crazy for saying that. We get it, too.” I think the disciples comforted Jesus like that at times, even though there was much they did not understand. John the Baptist had disciples, too … maybe they comforted him in this way. I think the ones that comforted him the most, however, were those disciples of his that left him and followed the One he spoke about. I know that is the greatest blessing for me.

Of course, we are sharing God’s heart, as well. Only those outside the camp truly do. Sometimes you have to walk in the camp to love those there and call them out to where you are. Just don’t stay in there too long, however. You may get comfortable not wearing the skins of animals and feeding off of locusts.

But don’t worry. I’ll be there to call you back. Lord willing.

Peace.

quick video link – awkward silence

Sunday, December 17th, 2006

So if you were in Korea, you know these dudes, students of ours, that put together a kinda lip sync band called Awkward Silence. They would make these videos using the video equipment at the school. They were kinda creative here and there and very funny. I was asked to have a cameo in one … here it is. Watch carefully for me. I rock.

Click here to see it.

Peace.

TICFITB #20 — Changing the World

Monday, December 11th, 2006

This will be the last TICFITB. I know. It’s sad to see them go. But I decided to just stop at 20. There will be a new series coming up sometime around Christmas, so stay tuned!

There is a certain concept in Christianity that was prevalent when Jesus taught, and it has consistently reared its head for the past two thousand years.

Many Christians see the message of Christ, one of peace, hope, love, grace, and then compare it to the world we live in. They are vastly different. They picture a world where these things are realized for the masses, where wars will end as forgiveness spreads, where hunger ceases as our greed gives way to love, where prejudice dissipates in the light of an understanding that we are all equal in the sight of our Creator. They see that the Gospel can change society and ultimately the whole world.

These are all lofty goals. But the problem is … I cannot seem to find these goals in the New Testament.

The Gospel is not a worldly thing. One of the main things that makes the Gospel different from every other religion is that it Christ has not promised to change the world while in this state. The redemption of this world will only happen when it is consumed in flames, dies, and is reborn again as a new heaven and a new earth. We are never promised that the world will change before that event. In fact, if we read Revelation and other verses, we are promised that the world will fall deeper into sin.

In contrast, the Church will become more and more pure as the Bride of Christ. As apocalyptic as Revelation can be, it concludes with a pure Bride prepared for her Husband.

As Christ walked the earth, this idea that the Gospel should change the world exhibited itself in the Jewish desire for an earthly king. The people wanted Jesus to be their idea of a promised Messiah, one that would lead an army and throw off the shackles of their Roman oppressors. Jesus did not play this game, however, and actually honored the Roman authority and taught others to do the same.

This was because He knew that His presence on this earth was not to change a worldly government. It was not to feed all the hungry people. It was not to heal every disease. It was not to make everyone play nice and live in some sort of earthly Utopian harmony. Christ came to be the example of someone who lived for another Kingdom, died so others could live and rose in power to live at the right hand of His Father. His good confession before Pilate?

“My Kingdom is not of this world.”

Religion attempts to make the Kingdom of this world. It fails and will always fail, but that doesn’t stop many from falling for the easy deception that has lasted for thousands of years.

In our modern time, this happens in a number of different ways. Some fight to be part of the moral majority or to keep scripture on public monuments or to raise taxes and force the redistribution of wealth or stop wars because the innocent die or a host of other activities we see as “Christian” but are ultimately attempts at making this world look like the next.

It will never work. Christ promised that there would be wars and rumors of wars and that the world would hate us and that there would be grand deceptions. The Apostles wrote in the New Testament of many falling away and refusing to get married or eating certain foods.

The problem is that the New Testament does make certain things very clear. In loving those around us, we are supposed to feed the poor, protect the oppressed, father the orphan and provide for the widow. These are very real exhibitions of Christ in us. But they are not done to change the world and make it a better place. They are done to express Christ and to gain us reward in Heaven. We give sacrificially to others because Christ did that to us. It’s called grace. And as we fulfill that calling, we are rewarded in the eternal Kingdom we actually belong to.

Indian religions attempt to rid the world of suffering. Jesus said, “the poor you will have with you always.” The Chinese philosophies attempt to create perpetual harmony on the earth. Jesus said, “there will be wars and rumors of wars.” Religious American Christians attempt to become the moral majority in a secular nation and society when Christ said the world would hate us and persecute us.

You know why the world doesn’t really persecute most American Christians? We look more like the world than we do like Christ. If we gave grace and mercy and healed the sick and fed the hungry and took care of the weak among us, if we made this a priority instead of political battles and building the next state of the art facility, we would see persecution because of our Christ-like love. I guarantee it. It sounds crazy, but it is true. Our rightousness would bring out the depravity of this world. The Light exposes things.

To be honest, one of the most recent trends among Christians to change this world is the rise of socialism among the younger generation. This is especially problematic and disturbing to me. To understand the ideas behind socialism is to understand communism. And to understand communism is to understand a philosophy that proposes the difference between bad and good is the way people are raised, not the inherent sinful nature that all possess. To believe in socialism is to believe that people are basically good and that, given the right circumstances, would grow up to be really nice people if we could just make them wear school uniforms, all get the same grades, make sure no one ever feels like a failure, meet all of their needs and most of their wants, and build up their self-esteem. Of course, this removes the depravity of man which removes sin and a need for a savior, since telling someone they need a savior would suggest something might be wrong.

I’ll mention here, too, the conflicting evidence that communists/socialists (what I call neo-communists) also believe that the rich are evil (look at the bad guys in most movies … they just want to tear down that nice apartment complex to build their condos!) and need to be punished with more taxes. If people are basically good and they just need to be put in the right physical environment, why is there so much white-collar crime? Why the concept that the rich are evil?

To be a neo-communist, you must also believe that the government will take care of people better than they can themselves, which is just another religious belief since it is not based on any historical evidence of fact and must be taken by faith, however misled it might be.

Seeing Christians delve so strongly into the idea of forced redistribution of wealth, which is neo-communism, and hear them proudly base it on their “Christian” beliefs and that it will make a better world is actually disturbing to me. Maybe they’re just ignorant, but deception can be a powerful thing.

God will have a people who understand that their Kingdom is not of this world, that their citizenship is in Heaven, that they are, in effect, dead and their true lives are hidden safely within Christ at the right hand of God. That they give and love because there is another world, that this world is hopelessly lost, and itself even longs for redemption. All creation groans for it. It wants to be consumed in fire and reborn anew.

So should we.

Peace.

Sounding Off

Monday, December 11th, 2006

Since the elections, I haven’t really had one of these … this perked me up the other day, so I guess I’ll write a little sompin here …

As I’ve flipped around the television lately, something has caught my eye and begs an important question.

Why do all the TV ministers have bad hair? Is it some sort of rule? When they audition for the show, does the director say, “ok, the polyester suit is cool, but can’t you do something unnatural with your hair?” Do they really have someone do their hair, look at it in the mirror and say, “Hallelujah, now I look holy”? It really is pretty ridiculous sometimes. It would be one thing if the problem was rare, but it is pervasive. And this problem knows no doctrinal boundaries, both charismatic and evangelical alike. Our African American brothers aren’t quite as bad. Many have given up the straightened hair look, thank God. Although some of the suits or getups (costumes?) of our more ethnic family can me up, too.

Of course, I don’t really watch much of these religious shows. Even when I try to give grace and listen despite their ridiculous look, most of the time what they have to say can be just as convoluted and I can’t watch much longer than about a minute or two. Every now and then a good sermon comes out and I’m blessed, though. Keep searching for the Mystery, I guess.

Peace.

TICFITB #19 — An End to the Gifts of the Spirit

Thursday, December 7th, 2006

I grew up in a very evangelical fellowship, as I’ve explained before. They taught me much about the Lord, and I am grateful for my spiritual heritage. Many do not have the blessings that God afforded me through those early relationships (of course, those things will be required of me, as well, but that’s a discussion for another time).

Most Christians that I knew were also evangelical in their doctrinal viewpoints. Since we lived in Georgia, the Bible Belt, the South, your Protestant side of the fence was incredibly important. Those of the more charismatic camp were in the minority where I lived. Catholics were practically unknown. I’ve met people who lived north of the Dixon line and did not grow up tearfully singing along with Elvis Presley, “Glory, glory, hallelujah,” at the lasershow in Stone Mountain. Many truly did not have the same experience in their religious upbringing. Religious diversity was more common and expected in most northern areas.

In the South, at least when I was younger, it was a serious issue.

In discussions with those of different doctrines, two things kept coming up. One of the main discussions hinged around the security of our salvation, which even I won’t touch here … someday maybe. But the other main issue was speaking in tongues. That more than anything seemed to set charismatics and pentecostals apart.

Being the self indulgent intellectual that I am, I grew up ready to defend why said practice was wrong. This hinged, however, on a doctrine that either threw out all gifts of the Spirit or sifted out the supernatural ones and got rid of them. Or maybe the teaching only focused on speaking in tongues. Either way, there was much standing on a concept that some gifts of the Spirit are no longer in use.

Of course, as you may guess, I can’t seem to find that in the Bible.

As most of you know, my personal beliefs in regards to ALL the gifts of the Spirit have evolved over the years. This has originated from two directions. First, I have seen ample evidence of a scriptural expression of the gifts, either by first hand experience or by reading missionary accounts, generally about revivals. Second, I have read the scripture itself.

I can find a host of teaching on the gifts and what they are and how they are to be used, but I don’t find any mention of some arbitrary end to them between when the New Testament was written and today.

The main scripture I’ve heard used to support an end to gifts of the Spirit (namely tongues and prophecy) is the end of 1 Corinthians 13. Here Paul is comparing love to the gifts and lifting up love because while prophecy might fail at times or tongues may cease, love is eternal. And when that which is perfect has come, all those other things will pass away. I’ve heard taught that the “perfect” which has come is the Bible, which is the date given by many more conservative evangelicals to say that the supernatural gifts of the Spirit ended.

But here’s the problem. 1 Corinthians also says that knowledge will cease. Has knowledge ceased? In context, this is supernatural and natural knowledge, from what I can tell. If tongues and prophecy have ceased, then so has knowledge. And if knowledge has ceased, that makes our seminaries look pretty unnecessary. Aren’t we supposed to know the Bible?

Also, from what the context clearly implies, the “perfect” that will come is an eternal state of being with Christ. In our temporary physical state, love covers a multitude of sins since all is not known and will not be known until eternity is fully revealed in the Kingdom. Therefore, love is key. Otherwise, if the Bible is the “perfect,” then are we no longer held to the standard of love? Since we now know all things (supposedly because of the Bible), is it no longer necessary to do everything under the banner of love?

Of course, I would say that what Paul wrote that day in 1 Corinthians is just as valid today as then. The gifts of the Spirit are to be done in love because of our eternal natures and the many things we do not yet know. This is why the “love chapter” is in between two major discussions about the gifts of the Spirit (chapters 12 and 14).

It just seems like bad teaching of the scripture to me. Luckily, I’ve found more evangelical teachers over the years that have admitted the mistake … only to still stand on the idea that prophecy and especially tongues are no longer gifts of the Spirit. I’ve even heard one man I greatly respect as a teacher point out that there is a Greek verb used before tongues ceasing that is a more definitive verb; therefore at some point that gift especially will cease. On a verb tense we take away a couple gifts of the Spirit?

Nowhere is this expressly taught. And with the volume of teaching on the gifts and the supernatural in the New Testament, you would think that someone like Paul or Peter would have mentioned it.

Every gift of the Spirit is just as necessary as it was before, even tongues. And even though many might even deny them, I would say that most Christians interract with gifts more than they know. ALL of the gifts are for the edification of the Body. Why would God take any of them away? The Bible is for equipping and is complete as from the Spirit, but the Bible cannot replace the gifts of the Spirit. It was not meant to. And where certain gifts are not allowed, certain levels of edification cannot take place and will serve to create an unhealthy Body. Take one major vitamin or nutrient completely out of your diet and see what happens. You will get sick with something.

Just like nutrients, the gifts are for the Body while here on this temporal plane. There are standards for how they are used to truly be edifying. Taking too much zinc can poison you, but you need it to survive and fight of disease. Gifts are meant to edify, but they can also be abused. This is why Paul had to write 1 Corinthians 14 in the first place. Just because someone abuses zinc does not support any argument in favor of eliminating it altogether. The same can be said for any gift of the Spirit. If some abuse the gift, that does not invalidate the gift, only possibly the vessel.

In Heaven, however, we will not need Vitamin C or zinc. We will have a heavenly body. We shall also not need the gifts. We will be one with Christ. What more shall we need?

Until then, we have been given the gifts to edify one another. If you are of Christ, you have them. In fact, if you have the Spirit, you have access to them all when called upon to use them! We have each been given strengths at one time or another for leadership and certain roles in the Body. Either way, you have gifts from your renewed, resurrected spirit to share with others. Use them in love as the scripture directs and the Holy Spirit leads.

Peace.