TICFITB #17 — Christian Tithing

As a young man, I truly believed in God. My mother never had to drag me to church. She made it clear by her example and teaching that tithing was a requirement of Christian life. Even while my father was not as committed to the fellowship, my mother would manipulate the finances to honor God through her tithe. The money she gave went to support the salaries and other financial obligations of the church we attended. I always believed that tithing was essential. Why wouldn’t you give your tithe to support the fellowship you love?

Once someone becomes a Christian or begins to attend a fellowship, they will invariably hear a sermon, message or other teaching on the requirement of tithing. This is not always true, but many times it is discussed when someone becomes a “member.”

As I’ve continued to study the scripture, God has revealed an uncomfortable truth to me.

I don’t believe tithing is a requirement for Christians.

Now, you are hearing this from someone who has tithed consistently over the past 10 years or so. As I got married, Becca and I both felt the need, possibly conviction, to tithe from our salaries. But as I’ve experienced more of the freedom in Christ over the years, I’ve realized that tithing is a form of legalism, based in the Old Covenant, and not at all a part of the New.

Hear me out before you call me a heretic …

I know all the scriptures. I’ve probably used them. I know how the prophet tells us to test the Lord in our tithe, how He will bless us. I even know the scripture in the Gospel where Jesus admonishes the Jews that their tithing was something they were doing right.

I’ll address that one first, since I used to consider it evidence that Jesus supported tithing. Jesus was actually rebuking the Jews for what they had left undone, which was justice and mercy, while still adhering to the tithe in order to collect money. He was speaking in past tense of their adherence to the Law, which included a balance of mercy of justice. He was, in effect, rebuking them for keeping outward traditions but forsaking the foundational principles.

Which is the weakness of the Law and exactly what many do in the New Covenant when we tithe.

I’m going to point to a few important scriptures. The first is from Matthew 17 where the Jews are giving Jesus and His disciples a hard time for not paying the temple tax. Jesus asks Peter an important question. “From whom do the kings of the earth collect taxes, from their own sons or from strangers?” Peter of course responds that strangers pay taxes to the king. Jesus then says something very profound. “The sons are free.”

Then, of course, is the cool story where, in order not to offend the Jews, Jesus tells Peter to go fishing and get the coin out of the first fish he catches … which just happens to be the exact temple tax for Peter and Jesus combined, teaching the very statement he just made. As the King, all things belong to Him.

In other words, sons and daughters of the King should feel no need to pay a tax, since they are heirs of the Kingdom. And yet the exact opposite is the attitude we have in modern tithing.

The next scripture in 2 Corinthians 9. I’ll quote it for you so we can examine it. “But this I say: He who sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and he who sows bountifully will also reap bountifully. So let each one give as he purposes in his heart, not grudgingly or of necessity; for God loves a cheerful giver. And God is able to make all grace abound toward you, that you, always having all sufficiency in all things, may have an abundance for every good work.”

So we see that our giving is guided by the degree to which we want to reap. There is a sowing and reaping aspect here. Because we are free, we are not to give out of necessity or obligation. That is for common citizens. We are sons and daughters of the King and everything He has is ours. But sons still have to obey. When we are led to give and purpose to obey, there will be sufficient resources to complete it (believe me, I’ve done it) and when we give money or time or material goods to those in need we are actually sowing into the Kingdom and will recieve an eternal reward.

Nowhere in the New Testament is 10% given as a standard. You want to know what is? 100%.

Jesus said several times to different groups of people, “sell all that you have and give it to the poor.” Give it all away. This was not just to the Rich Young Ruler or those with a greed problem. Who doesn’t have a greed problem? And the direction is not to just acknowledge that all your money belongs to God, but it is to physically express it by giving it to the poor. Why aren’t we legalistic about that?

That is the giving standard set up by Christ and followed in the inception of the Church in Acts. Ananias and Sapphira were killed because they said they gave it all but had kept some for themselves. This goes right along with giving as you purpose in your heart, not out of some legalistic tradition or feeling of obligation.

We don’t really use the tithe for the main reasons the Bible tells us to give, anyway. Giving in the New Testament was for one of three reasons: 1) to the poor 2) to other needy Christians and 3) to mission work. Not once do we see money given to assure a minister’s salary or a place to meet. The only other New Testament directive on money is to work and support your family.

The principle I’m describing is wholly New Covenant. The New Covenant is not about adhering to a checklist but listening to the Spirit and obeying. Tithing generally requires no communication with God to specifically understand what He wants from you. In fact, it almost directs you to NOT talk to God about it because a doctrine or organization says to do it, so you gotta do it.

Perhaps God will tell you to give 10% or allow you to be babysat by the Law until you are mature enough to handle true giving. Either way, that’s up to Him. But be careful. Don’t say that he has directed you to tithe when He really hasn’t and you’re just trying to justify a tradition. Seek Him out and hear from Him.

The danger of our modern idea of a tithe is that very little of it goes to the type of giving I describe earlier. A vast majority of it is to used to support ministry positions that aren’t even mentioned or described in the scripture and a building that we hold too dear. Very little of it is used to be the actual salt of the Earth, which is giving to the poor and those within the Church who are in need, like widows and orphans. When is the last time you saw a fellowship support a widow and her family? The early Church did it often. They even had rules about it. Missions giving is also a small portion of what we do.

To be clear, the Spirit will always be in line with the scripture. I am not advocating doing whatever we want with our money and excusing ourselves with being led by the Spirit. I would be very concerned with someone who told me that God has directed them not to give at all. That is against His nature, and if He has shared His nature with you, giving is a primary call of your life.

If you’re truly seeking Him, I’ll be so bold as to say you might drop less into a passing plate and more into the hands of needy people that cross your path. It will become more personal, spontaneous and less legalistic. You’ll find yourself giving MORE than 10%. Although, you may not even notice it because to understand it in those terms could lead to pride. You will give more than you believe you could and have more than you believe you should. Believe me. I’ve been there.

If you choose to tithe out of a pure heart, then I believe there is a blessing in that, as well. It is an Old Testament promise under an Old Covenant, and ultimately you will have to move past it to follow God under the fullness of the New. The nature of God is relational. Why would financial giving be any different?

In closing, can you imagine what it would look like if every Christian gave more than 10% of their income to the poor, the needy among us, and to those going somewhere else to spread the gospel? It would hasten the Day of the Lord, I can assure you. Organizations might perish, but the Organism of the Body would find new life.

Peace.

5 Responses to “TICFITB #17 — Christian Tithing”

  1. Adam J. says:

    First let me say that I agree with you. The Biblical mandate for giving in the new testament is not 10% it is 100%. Acts 2 could also be interpreted as showing that we need to give everything that we have in abundance. Like selling land that we have and handing the money over to the church.

    Second, I also agree that there were specific purposes for giving in the New Testament. However, that said, I also believe that giving can and should go to support people in full time ministry, like myself. Granted that there is not provision in the New Testament for a “Student Minister”, but within that position I am fulfilling the Biblical role of Pastor, Teacher, etc. and I am actively making disciples. Also, as a full time “minister” I act as a local missionary to my community. So, if giving should go toward missions, doesn’t that count?

    The Bible is also clear in expressing that those who preach the gospel can (and arguably should) make their living in this way (1 Corinthians 9:14, 1 Timothy 5:17-18). Therefore, I would assume that part of the money given to the New Testament Church did, in fact, go to provide for the monetary needs of the Apostles.

    This idea would be completely in line with scripture and with the apostles actions. After all, the Apostles created the role of deacon so that they would not have to worry about smaller matters and could focus on the study and teaching of God’s word. So, it seems safe to assume that they didn’t work other jobs in order to provide for themselves or their families.

    I’m not trying to be argumentative here, I’m just trying to point out something that I think went overlooked.

    I genuinely agree with most of your ideas. And, though you may not agree with me in all of my thinking, from this side of the “full-time-ministers” fence, I can tell you that it is essential that some people serve in a full-time compacity and that others serve as tent makers like Paul did.

  2. Britt Mooney says:

    Okay, so I’ve thought about this, and I definitely don’t want to say that paid positions except for missions work are definitively unbiblical … but here’s an interesting scripture from 2 thessalonians to consider…

    “In the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, we command you, brothers, to keep away from every brother who is idle and does not live according to the teaching you received from us. For you yourselves know how you ought to follow our example. We were not idle when we were with you, nor did we eat anyone’s food without paying for it. On the contrary, we worked night and day, laboring and toiling so that we would not be a burden to any of you. We did this, not because we do not have the right to such help, but in order to make ourselves a model for you to follow. For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: “If a man will not work, he shall not eat.”

    We hear that some among you are idle. They are not busy; they are busybodies. Such people we command and urge in the Lord Jesus Christ to settle down and earn the bread they eat. And as for you, brothers, never tire of doing what is right.”

    If we use this as an example, even Paul, as the missionary, refused to be a burden and worked and toiled while he was there … and who in Thessalonica was the head pastor or had a paid position? It doesn’t seem that anyone did … the implication is that everyone should work at a job for what they eat, and Paul did not point out any exceptions here, which I find interesting.

    Again, I’m not totally against paid positions in the Body … I mainly feel that they are not generally supported by scripture and unwise for a variety of reasons which I could address on a later post …

    Peace.

  3. Adam J. says:

    That’s an interesting scripture that you bring up, but I think you have to look at the audience that he was setting the example for. If Paul’s intention was to set an example for the “average joe” Christian, then it makes sense that he would work and take no money for his ministry. Also it is interesting to note that he specifically says that he had the right to take money for his ministry labors.

    I think that it is clear that he is setting the example for the church in general and not for those who do ministry vocationally. I also think it is clear that in the early church there were those who did do ministry vocationally and that they were paid by it, based on the scriptures that I sited in my earlier comment.

    That is just my initial reaction to reading it, maybe more study will shed more light, what do you think?

  4. e's wife says:

    all I can see is the Day of the Lord hastening as believers, sons, heirs, give all that they have . . . Lord may it be so, and may it be soon!

  5. Anonymous says:

    “If Paul’s intention was to set an example for the “average joe” Christian, then it makes sense that he would work and take no money for his ministry.”

    Why should today’s pastors have different priorities than Paul’s?

Leave a Reply